Laserfiche WebLink
273 <br />274 <br />275 <br />276 <br />277 <br />278 <br />279 <br />280 <br />281 <br />282 <br />283 <br />284 <br />285 <br />286 <br />287 <br />288 <br />289 <br />290 <br />291 <br />292 <br />293 <br />294 <br />295 <br />296 <br />297 <br />298 <br />299 <br />300 <br />301 <br />302 <br />303 <br />304 <br />305 <br />306 <br />307 <br />308 <br />309 <br />310 <br />311 <br />312 <br />313 <br />314 <br />315 <br />316 <br />317 <br />318 <br />Roseville PWET Commission Meeting Minutes <br />Page 7, April 25, 2017 <br />was the potential for its contamination with increased non-residential use of the <br />leaf site and possibly requiring more city staff monitoring of that site. <br />Discussion ensued with Chair Cihacek identifying current areas for wood chips, <br />compost and additional materials on the displayed site map and potential <br />relocation areas to make access easier. Mr. Culver noted that the woodchips and <br />compost were available for pick-up as well as drop-off with gates — if installed — <br />needing to be left open over the weekends when residents are typically <br />performing their yard work and needing access for pick-up from the site. <br />Discussion continued on options including moving orga .cs collection into the <br />bay on the exterior of the site for 24/7 access without a ional staff costs for <br />weekends and still allowing access for organic d off without significantly <br />impacting the compost and wood chip materials. r identified the private <br />property on the northern edge of the site; and f er ad d concerns if gates <br />were left open overnight, as well as larger ' ith una ized dumping at <br />the site and having to pay staff to open a ose the gates. <br />Chair Cihacek suggested moving <br />access was relocated. <br />measure if <br />Mr. Culver agreed this may b id considerate r a long-term solution, but <br />would require additional city e the $5, owance from Ramsey <br />County in order to move the gate d r cess. the fall, Mr. Culver noted <br />that the site got ve full with leav re om for city staff to move the <br />rows around re ace for ci ating the ows. Mr. Culver stated that he <br />didn't disa with r Cihacek' suggestion, stated that he'd prefer to see <br />dumpsters ublic de of the ga well since they'd be more visible and <br />the hauler coul it them out being able to get into the gate or <br />cked by leaves frequently dropped off and <br />to move the leaves. However, without moving the <br />WitAvould be difficult. <br />RNredoin <br />i corments during staff's comments about the Parks & <br />Rrt nt concerns in loosing any additional parking spots at <br />su1 ations for recycling and/or organic collection, Member <br />Were was an opportunity to minimize the loss of parking spaces <br />wrking areas to expand drop off areas. Mr. Culver reported that <br />sepots had been added recently where possible, but also noted the <br />additional demand for parking when activities are underway at parks (e.g. <br />baseball and soccer fields). <br />Member Trainor encouraged rethinking the potential organic collection site as <br />suggested by Member Wozniak, opining that this type of collection has the <br />hallmarks of growing as recycling has grown in the community. Member Trainor <br />opined that this industrial site has a strong list of cons and isn't appealing to <br />people as well as being in close proximity to an incredibly busy 4 -way stop with <br />