My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017_0314_FC_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Finance Commission
>
Packet
>
2017_0314_FC_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2017 1:39:47 PM
Creation date
7/14/2017 1:39:31 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Finance Commission Minutes <br />February 14, 2017 – Draft Minutes <br />Page 7 of 8 <br /> <br />Finance Director Miller stated Legislature has to change the rate and has historically happened 271 <br />once every 4-5 years and this is currently 6.75% for employees in coordinator plan and is 12.5% 272 <br />for police and fire and the percent is a little less for employees. 273 <br /> 274 <br />Commissioner Murray stated the documents state legislature has set the expected rate of return at 275 <br />8% and the City has this at 7.5%. This creates a funding gap but it looks like the fire fund is 276 <br />overfunded. The long-term expected rate of return rate for pension funds is typically 6.9%. He 277 <br />stated there would always be a funding deficit unless the market changes significantly. He asked 278 <br />if the $34 per month contribution rate for firefighters was a set amount or if this was adjusted for 279 <br />inflation. 280 <br /> 281 <br />Finance Director Miller stated this is a fixed amount and this is established by the City Council. 282 <br />The City Council can change this contribution rate. 283 <br /> 284 <br />Commissioner Murray stated the legislature sets the rate the City contributes and the actuaries 285 <br />come up with they are going to pay out and the earnings rate. The City has no control over these 286 <br />amounts. He suggested when the City has a contract with the unions or City employees that 287 <br />there is language that states the City would contribute to their PERA fund but what the employee 288 <br />gets out of the fund is between the employee and the PERA. 289 <br /> 290 <br />Finance Director Miller stated this couldn’t be included because the City cannot supersede State 291 <br />law. State law covers the employees and only it dictates what employees get. There is an 292 <br />unfunded liability of $12million to account for the funding gaps. 293 <br /> 294 <br />Commissioner Bachhuber stated the State has created the rules that creates the unfunded balance 295 <br />for the City. 296 <br /> 297 <br />Finance Director Miller stated State law does not allow the City to leave this pension plan. 298 <br /> 299 <br />Commissioner Bachhuber stated the actuary assumptions have nothing to do with what will 300 <br />actually be paid. 301 <br /> 302 <br />Commissioner Zeller stated the City can start setting aside funding for this since they are aware 303 <br />that it will be coming due in the future. 304 <br /> 305 <br />Chair Schroeder suggested the Commission review this fund annually. 306 <br /> 307 <br /> 308 <br />Identify Discussion Items for the Future Meeting 309 <br /> 310 <br />Chair Schroeder stated prior to the next meeting the Commission will have the tour of the 311 <br />maintenance facility. Finance Director Miller will verify the time. The comment card needed 312 <br />more time and will be reviewed in March. The March agenda will also include the investment 313 <br />portfolio performance review and discussions on the tracking report. There may be a new 314 <br />Commissioner identified by the March meeting. 315
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.