Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,June 19, 2017 <br /> Page 18 <br /> However, Ms. Collins advised that for the city's zoning classification the density <br /> range must begin at eight units per acre. <br /> In that case, Mayor Roe suggested the city could adjust its MDR designation into <br /> different categories as it had most recently done with its CMU designations, such <br /> as MDR-1 at 5 to 8 units and MDR2 at 8 to 12 units, without the entire zoning <br /> category starting at 8 units/acre. Mayor Roe suggested consideration could also <br /> be given to an intermediate category between MDR and HDR that would also in- <br /> crease density levels, or increase CMU designations as another option. In gen- <br /> eral, Mayor Roe opined that the Metropolitan Council's guidance does not prohib- <br /> it the city from pursuing those options not preclude Roseville and the City Coun- <br /> cil from valuing various housing types and intermixing housing stock. <br /> Councilmember Etten asked if by developing affordable housing at 8 units per <br /> acre, it provided the city with credits and lowered the total number of units need- <br /> ed and available for development by 2040; with Ms. Collins confirming that the <br /> Metropolitan Council looked at all built affordable housing in their calculations <br /> for Roseville's local and regional share. Councilmember Etten agreed that he was <br /> also caught off guard in Roseville being designated "urban; and suggested staff <br /> work with the city's Metropolitan Council representative to determine what was <br /> involved in that process. <br /> Ms. Collins advised that the "urban" designation resulted from Roseville being <br /> considered a developed community, with different categories triggering density <br /> ranges; and read the definition of"urban" from Metropolitan Council documents. <br /> Councilmember Willmus asked staff to provide information on populations and <br /> households in Roseville and changes from 2000 to 2010 providing a more histori- <br /> cal view in order to determine if projections are in line with them. <br /> As noted with the Rice Street/Larpenteur Avenue community visioning group dis- <br /> cussions, Ms. Collins advised that St. Paul had seen significant growth in single- <br /> family areas in the last few years, with the population increasing while few single <br /> family or residential homes had been constructed during that same period. Ms. <br /> Collins reported that this was attributed to the population change of seniors mov- <br /> ing out of their single-family homes and larger families moving into them. <br /> Councilmember McGehee asked staff to provide the Metropolitan Council's defi- <br /> nition of"suburban" and related density requirements. <br /> Ms. Collins noted the window of time allowed to challenge that designation pro- <br /> vided by the Metropolitan Council in 2015 at which time it was not challenged. If <br /> the city was to make a compelling case at this time as to why it should remain <br /> designated "suburban" in comparison to peer communities, Ms. Collins opined <br />