My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017_0718_REDA Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Economic Development Authority
>
Minutes
>
2017
>
2017_0718_REDA Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2017 9:33:34 AM
Creation date
8/16/2017 9:32:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Economic Development Authority
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
7/18/2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REDA Meeting <br /> Minutes—Tuesday,July 18,2017 <br /> Page 6 <br /> and titles didn't reflect that and therefore, needed to be retitled to address <br /> mixed uses and future land use discussions. Ms. Purdu advised that the <br /> Planning Commission had also looked in-depth at some Regional and <br /> Neighborhood Business mixed uses and indications were that there would be <br /> room for some residential in that mix; restated as allowing for residential use <br /> but not requiring it. Ms. Purdu opined that this served to increase the <br /> possibilities and make administration of those various designations clearer on <br /> the spectrum that will assist staff in rewriting and interpreting zoning districts. <br /> Member McGehee asked then if the problem was apparently with a lack of <br /> clarity between Regional and Community Business designations, and that this <br /> proposed restructure served to clarify it. <br /> Ms. Purdu noted that first, language was removed that talked about where <br /> customers came from as a basis in trying to distinguish businesses in those <br /> categories. Ms. Purdu stated that some small unique businesses may have a <br /> regional draw, but would not require parking and other infrastructure needs <br /> such as would be found at Rosedale Center. Therefore, Ms. Purdu noted that <br /> the list of uses in each district were flexible, but meant to show up on the <br /> spectrum without too much specificity to allow staff to write corresponding <br /> zoning requirements (e.g. parking, height restrictions, etc.) and leave those <br /> specifics up to the zoning code, since the comprehensive plan is intended to <br /> look at a broader range. <br /> Comparing the 2030 and 2040 future land use maps, Member Etten noted that <br /> the intersection of County Road C and Snelling Avenue the 2040 map moved <br /> all parcels along that interior service road to the MU-2 designation while <br /> properties to the north and east remained MU-3 designation. Also, Member <br /> Etten asked for the rationale in the Har Mar Mall area and why it didn't move <br /> to MU-3, since based on his review of descriptions, it appeared to fit that <br /> designation as well. <br /> President Roe noted that the upcoming discussion included the land use map <br /> and suggested retaining that question for that discussion. <br /> Specific to designations, President Roe noted several districts had mandatory <br /> residential components. President Roe noted current Neighborhood Business <br /> nodes that usually had 1-2 properties in from intersections, and with a <br /> mandatory 40% to 75% mandatory residential use on those sites, it didn't leave <br /> much if any capacity for a commercial aspect (e.g. small hardware store). <br /> Therefore, President Roe asked if the city would be putting itself in a corner <br /> that doesn't work practically based on how those nodes are currently <br /> positioned in the city. President Roe also expressed concerns about those <br /> mandatory in the former CMU, now MU-2 designated areas. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.