Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission –Comprehensive Plan Update <br />Minutes –Wednesday, January 25, 2017 <br /> <br />Page 4 <br />watershed districts, the Metropolitan Council, Ramsey County, State of MN and <br />112 <br />the consultant hired by the city that would be responsible for the <br />113 <br />transportation/Public works scope and for discussion of specific areas of interest. <br />114 <br />At the request of Chair Boguszewski, Ms. Perduclarified that the agency <br />115 <br />meetings would be geared more toward staff versus County Commissioners or <br />116 <br />other surrounding units of government with the goal todetermine how they <br />117 <br />influenced the city’s comprehensive plan form a local and regional perspective. <br />118 <br />Member Bull suggested including health care needs if there wasn’t something else <br />119 <br />that addressed health care, including for younger people (e.g. hospitals orclinics) <br />120 <br />and more neighborhood networks with businesses and neighborhood malls that <br />121 <br />were conceptualized last time, including neighborhood clinics, education, <br />122 <br />employment and walking/biking amenities. <br />123 <br />Ms. Perdunoted that wasn’t something they had contemplated, but agreed it was <br />124 <br />worth considering, and thanked Member Bull for that suggestion. <br />125 <br />Ms. Perducontinued with the four geography-based neighborhood “walkabout” <br />126 <br />meetings. <br />127 <br />Chair Boguszewski asked if staff would be on hand and asked how those wanting <br />128 <br />to attend but perhaps mobility impaired would be accommodated. <br />129 <br />Ms. Perduagreed that was a good point to consider; and noted the actual area may <br />130 <br />dictate whether or not it was a “walkabout” or simply a meeting in an open place. <br />131 <br />Member Murphy noted the good attendance as the August “Night Out” events, <br />132 <br />and suggested some be scheduled then or people trained to meet people in their <br />133 <br />neighborhoods to update them on where the process was at; opining that may <br />134 <br />provide a great opportunity to receive additional input. <br />135 <br />Chair Boguszewski noted that many of those block parties for the “Night Out” <br />136 <br />picked up information at City Hall as they scheduled their events and suggested <br />137 <br />staff could be available for facilitators or to alert those picking up information <br />138 <br />with additional information and alerting the leads of the city’s interest in their <br />139 <br />input. <br />140 <br />Ms. Perduagreed that was a good suggestion and noted the goal of this effort was <br />141 <br />to reach under-represented populations by going to them. Ms. Perduadvised that <br />142 <br />staff was assisting in choosing the locations most applicable to meet this goal; <br />143 <br />with three locations tentatively mapped out at this point. <br />144 <br />Mr. Lloyd noted that the City Council had been asked, and the Planning <br />145 <br />Commission as well to email staff with their additional ideas includingsuggested <br />146 <br />locations; outlining the three areas chosen to-date: SE Roseville beyond the <br />147 <br />corridor visioning area done as a separate project; the NW corner of the city on <br />148 <br />the other side of the commercial/industrial area; and the Snelling Avenue/County <br />149 <br />Road Barea (west of Snelling) and the residential area immediately behind the <br />150 <br />commercial/retail area. <br />151 <br /> <br />