Res_11432 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

EXTRACT OF THE MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Roseville, Ramsey County, State of Minnesota, was held on the 14th day of, August, 2017 at 6:00 p.m. The following City Council Members were present: Willmus, Laliberte, Etten, McGehee and Roe and the following absent: none. City Council Member Willmus introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 11432 A RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING THE DENIAL OF A REQUEST FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE CENTRE POINTE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 1177 TO PERMIT MULTI-STORY CLIMATE CONTROLLED SELF-STORAGE AS APERMITTED USE AT 3015 CENTRE POINTE DRIVE (PF17-010) WHEREAS, the City of Roseville has received a valid application for approval of a Concept Planned Unit Development to amend the Centre Pointe Planned Unit Development; and WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council at its regular meeting on July 24, 2017, reviewed the application along with the record of the public proceedings, including City staff report and public consideration, by and between the City Council, and denied the application based on the following factual findings: 1. Planned Unit Development Agreement 1177 contains a permitted use table that sufficiently describes the appropriate uses for the subject property and the proposed amendment contradicts the previously determined appropriate uses. 2. The storage use proposed by the amendment is specifically described as a not permitted use in the Office/Business Park District the designation covering the subject property on the City's Official Zoning Map. 3. The introduction of retail uses such as the proposed use, rather than business-office, is inconsistent with the intent of the original PUD Agreement. 4. The purpose of employment districts, such as the area governed by the PUD, is to generate job creation uses as a primary use, rather than a supportive use. The proposed amendment is inconsistent with this zoning purpose. AND WHEREAS, said findings of fact underpinning the denial were reported to the property owner and applicant in a letter dated July 28, 2017, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville, Minnesota, that the application discussed herein was denied July 24, 2017. The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Etten and upon a vote taken thereon, the following voted in favor: Willmus, Laliberte, Etten, McGehee and Roe and none voted against. WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.