My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2017_0717
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2017
>
CC_Minutes_2017_0717
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2017 9:05:28 AM
Creation date
8/18/2017 9:03:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/17/2017
Meeting Type
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,July 17,2017 <br /> Page 7 <br /> Councilmember Etten agreed with Councilmember McGehee in not being ready <br /> to tie into a 3% levy increase target until it was determined what a responsible <br /> percentage may be. Councilmember Etten asked Mayor Roe if his 3% target in- <br /> cluded new CIP or if that was a separate issue. If the 3% includes addressing on- <br /> going expenses and CIP, Councilmember Etten noted that in past decades, the <br /> City Council still hadn't addressed the CIP sufficiently and it remained an area to <br /> further discuss and take action on. <br /> Mayor Roe responded that he hadn't thought that far ahead beyond the $160,000 <br /> identified by staff as an increase in the CIP (Pavement Management Program). In <br /> response to Councilmember Etten, Mayor Roe stated that he would be open to <br /> considering improving the CIP deficit on top of the 3% figure. <br /> Councilmember McGehee emphasized her alternate funding options for water and <br /> sewer funds similar to bonding as as an alternative to fees, providing estimates of <br /> the minor differences with her proposed option. <br /> If there was sufficient interest on the part of the full Council, Councilmember <br /> McGehee suggested looking into residential base rates, with the Public Works, <br /> Environment and Transportation and/or Finance Commissions taking a look at it <br /> to see if relative contributions of residential and commercial base fees lined up. <br /> Councilmembers Willmus and Etten agreed with Councilmember McGehee; and <br /> without objection, Mayor Roe indicated that the council so directed staff to re- <br /> view the balance between commercial and residential contributions to water and <br /> sewer base fees. <br /> Specific to reserve monies, Mayor Roe noted that these were already taxes col- <br /> lected from city taxpayers; and opined that those taxpayers would rather have that <br /> money put to use versus stockpiled in the bank. While recognizing that projec- <br /> tions may come in higher or lower and expenses may also vary, Mayor Roe <br /> opined that any tax levy impacts that can be mitigated, including the use of re- <br /> serves, should remain on the table. <br /> Along those lines, Councilmember Willmus opined that it was important to strive <br /> to maintain the midpoint reserve level policy goal. Councilmember Willmus fur- <br /> ther opined that what was proposed for the future actually served to wean off <br /> those reserves in some areas when the city didn't over-levy. <br /> Councilmember McGehee agreed that the city shouldn't over-levy, but if using <br /> reserves, they should be allocated toward the CIP. Councilmember McGehee ad- <br /> dressed the increase in taxes as a result of not setting aside funds for the Pavement <br /> Management Program (PMP) as was directed and creating a large impact for tax- <br /> payers. Councilmember McGehee noted that if such a deficit should occur again <br /> during a recession or when the legislature changes city levy limits again, it could <br /> again cause trouble. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.