Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />ROSEVILLE ETHICS COMMISSION <br />MEETING <br /> <br /> OCTOBER 31, 2001 <br />7:30 a.m. <br /> <br />Chair Connie Pease called the meeting to order on Wednesday, October 31, 2001 at <br />7:30a.m. <br /> <br />Members Present: Connie Pease, Richard Langseth, Tom Ring, Robert Kippley and <br />Mark Battis <br /> <br />Others Present: Neal Beets, Christine Butterfield and Joel Jamnik <br /> <br /> <br />Mayor Kysylyczyn stated that a public meeting should be posted 72-hours prior to the <br />meeting and he said the notice was not on the bulletin board. He stated he and his <br />attorney were not notified about the meeting 72-hours prior and he is the subject of the <br />complaint. After talking with Christine Butterfield, Beets stated that the notice was <br />posted on a corner of the Bulletin Board and the posting date was October 26, 2001. <br />Beets apologized to the Mayor and his attorney that they were not informed earlier of the <br />meeting but stated there is no additional deliberation on the Lambert Complaint and that <br />we are not here to take testimony or explore the merits of the complaint. Draft of <br />correspondence relating to the Ethics complaint, which basically takes the verbal <br />discussion and verbal motions voted upon at the last meeting and simply puts them in a <br />written form so they can be conveyed to the City Council. This Commission understands <br />that it has an obligation to convey a recommendation and some findings and reasons <br />relating to this Ethics complaint just as you did when the Mayor filed his complaint <br />against Mr. Sarkozy, Maschka and Burrell. After further checking, Beets discovered <br />after the Commission made its motions and decisions with respect to the other <br />complaints, we followed the same procedures then as we followed this time. We did not <br />provide any special notice to Mr. Sarkozy, Maschka and Burrell but simply noticed the <br />open meeting, the Commission took action upon the letter to be submitted to the City <br />Council and we went forward. Just as Mr. Sarkozy, Maschka and Burrell had an <br />opportunity to respond to that proposed letter as it went to the City Council, the Mayor <br />will have a full and fair opportunity before the City Council. He and his attorney can <br />make whatever argument they would like to make. The Commission has met for 7 <br />months regarding this matter and four motions were adopted at the last meeting. We are <br /> 1 <br /> <br />