My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2001_0717_ET_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Ethics Commission
>
Minutes
>
2001_0717_ET_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2017 3:49:18 PM
Creation date
8/24/2017 3:49:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Ethics Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Coversheet
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ROSEVILLE <br /> ETHICS COMMISSION MEETING <br /> MINUTES <br />Tuesday, July 17, 2001 <br /> <br /> 7:30 a.m. <br /> <br />Chair Connie Pease called the meeting to order on Tuesday, July 17, 2001. <br /> Members Present: Connie Pease, Tom Ring, Robert Kippley and Richard <br /> <br />Langseth <br /> Absent: Mark Battis (Excused) <br /> <br />Others Present: Joel Jamnik <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Approval of June 26, 2001 Minutes:Connie Pease wanted the let the Record reflect that <br />the commission became aware June 26, that Mark had a potential alleged conflict of <br />interest. <br /> <br />Tom Ring moved to approve the minutes of June 26, 2001. Robert Kippley seconded. <br />Motion passed. <br /> <br /> <br />Review of Two Ethics Violation Claims - Resolution 8593 <br /> <br /> <br />JULY 3, 2001 <br />Ms. Pease asked if Mayor John Kysylyczyn was unduly influenced by money? Ms. <br />Pease stated a need to determine if it meets our policy and if there is an Ethics violation <br />that we should look into. <br /> <br /> <br />Tom Ring asked if the alleged complaint was against all named individuals, not just <br />Dean Maschka? The others mentioned were Joel Jamnik, Ed Burrell and Steve Sarkozy. <br />Was it unethical for these people to meet with State Legislators on city time? Maschka <br />was on his own time but Sarkozy and Burrell were on city time and unavailable to <br />citizens. Did Mr. Jamnik bill the city for his time for that incident? Were expense <br />reimbursements made? Ms. Pease stated this is a different question from the complaint <br />on the Mayor, since his is influenced by money. <br /> <br />Ms. Pease read the three Roseville Ethics Resolutions which were cited as possible <br />infractions: Section 3(i) No public official shall exceed his/her authority or breach the <br />law or ask others to do so. Section 3 (L) Public officials shall provide complete <br />documentation to support a request for expense reimbursement. Expense reimbursement <br />shall be made in accordance with city policy. Section 3 (K) No public official shall use <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.