My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017-9-5_PR Comm Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Minutes
>
2017
>
2017-9-5_PR Comm Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2017 10:03:11 AM
Creation date
10/5/2017 10:03:10 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />The total approved project costs include: <br />Project Cost Amount <br />Actual Project Cost $2,953,900 <br />Alternative #2: Certified Lumber $82,000 <br />Total Project Cost $3,035,900 <br /> <br />Vice-Chair O’Brien questioned if the utilization of the Golf Course Fund means <br />that it will be changed from an Enterprise fund. Staff confirmed that at this time it <br />is an Enterprise Fund as there are still some monies remaining. Further discussion <br />on this topic are expected in the future. <br /> <br />Commissioner Stoner was concerned about the amount of the Park Dedication <br />fund utilized for the Cedarholm Community Building project. However, <br />expressed appreciation that the project is moving forward. <br /> <br /> City Council Joint Meeting Review <br />ii. <br />Commissioner O’Brien commented that the City Council appeared to have <br />specific requests for the Commission in terms of the Capital Improvement Plan <br />(CIP). <br /> <br />Staff agreed and suggested that they provide background information on the <br />Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) at an upcoming meeting. <br /> <br />The Commission had a discussion on the joint meeting and the feedback they <br />received from the City Council including capital assets and lobbying for the <br />OVAL bonding at the legislature. They agreed that they would like to increase <br />their understanding and participation in these items. Staff will provide <br />background information at an upcoming meeting. <br /> <br />Commissioner Stoner noted that he felt the Council had a desire for the Parks and <br />Recreation Commission to be more active on a variety of issues and to come up <br />with the next “big push”. <br /> <br />Vice-Chair O’Brien reiterated the feeling that the City Council was looking for <br />the “next big thing” and that the Master Plan is not done. She also suggested <br />creating a progress tracking system to assess the status of remaining Master Plan <br />items. <br /> <br />Staff stated that Phase 1 of the Renewal Program is complete. Phase 2 is to sustain <br />those items that were accomplished in Phase 1. A community center is also <br />identified in the Master Plan as a desire by the community. <br /> <br />Chair Gelbach questioned how best to communicate what has been done. He <br />suggested devising a plan to get accomplishments out to the community. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.