Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, August 14, 2017 <br /> Page 12 <br /> on an annual basis, stating that he was prepared to deal with that decision-making <br /> going forward. <br /> Councilmember Willmus stated that he too recognized Councilmember McGe- <br /> hee's concerns with financial sustainability and break-even costs. When also sit- <br /> ting through the PMP planning process and implementation meetings, Coun- <br /> cilmember Willmus stated that one thing became clear to him: that this communi- <br /> ty strongly desired meeting places in close proximity to where they lived and their <br /> neighborhoods, noting that was largely what these community buildings were <br /> now accomplishing. Having lived in Roseville his entire life and watching the <br /> ever-increasing use of parks, particularly those facilities recently replaced or con- <br /> structed, Councilmember Willmus opined that they represented an intangible that <br /> couldn't be addressed as a dollar amount on a spreadsheet, but did provide a tre- <br /> mendous benefit to the community and those neighborhoods. When stepping be- <br /> yond those black and white numbers for construction and operating costs, and see <br /> new families moving to Roseville with an option of using this gathering space, <br /> Councilmember Willmus noted that it represented some of the real things that at- <br /> tracted people to the community and helped it stay vibrant. Therefore, Coun- <br /> cilmember Willmus opined that this was another step in that direction; and further <br /> opined that this building was different enough and larger in size to enhance those <br /> other community gathering facilities. Councilmember Willmus spoke in appre- <br /> ciation of Councilmember McGehee's financial perspective, but noted how that <br /> broader picture came into play for him as well. <br /> Councilmember Etten stated his agreement with the comments of Councilmember <br /> Willmus and Mayor Roe in seeing these buildings as community resources. In <br /> presentations made to the City Council prior to their construction, Councilmem- <br /> ber Etten noted that the park buildings were never billed as revenue generators, <br /> but intended as a community resource. Councilmember Etten also noted that this <br /> larger facility, as addressed by Councilmember Willmus, also brought another op- <br /> tion into the picture for the community's use beyond existing gathering spaces; <br /> and agreed that the proposed clubhouse went beyond strictly dollars when consid- <br /> ered as a community resource, with demand high and the community responding <br /> favorably to these upgrades. Therefore, Councilmember Etten offered his support <br /> for the motion. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte recognized the comments of her colleagues as all being <br /> valid and none counter to each other. While not a topic for tonight, but in light of <br /> these additional ongoing costs, as she'd suggested in the past, Councilmember <br /> Laliberte noted the need to look at ways to drive more revenue-generating oppor- <br /> tunities with these buildings, the License Center, and increasing revenue in the <br /> city operations beyond how a municipality typically looked at those operations. <br /> Councilmember McGehee agreed that she also saw this as an intangible commu- <br /> nity resource; but also noted the City Council's responsibility to look at the bot- <br /> tom line. Given the amount of tax revenue being allotted to these facilities, <br />