Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, September 11, 2017 <br /> Page 11 <br /> Mayor Roe clarified that this may or may not be a zoning question. <br /> Councilmember Etten agreed with Mayor Roe's overall source as a starting point. <br /> Councilmember Etten stated that he didn't worry about RB except on the north <br /> side of the Rosedale Center complex abutting single-family residential. Coun- <br /> cilmember Etten noted that height and density had been talked about extensively <br /> over the last few months, and would support such a recommendation. <br /> Mayor Roe concurred with Councilmember McGehee about CU for multi-family <br /> uses of 3-8 units in NB with smaller buildings. <br /> Councilmember Willmus stated that he wouldn't support a use under CU in NB, <br /> opining that the crux of this much-discussed issue was what the city wanted as a <br /> permitted use in RB areas. With prompting by Mayor Roe, Councilmember <br /> Willmus clarified that the city should hold off on NB and CB completely at this <br /> time. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte agreed with that, stating her preference to focus on RB <br /> unless the Planning Commission wouldn't be aware of this NB and CB discus- <br /> sion, especially since the city was currently in the middle of the comprehensive <br /> plan process. <br /> Mayor Roe and Councilmember Willmus agreed that timing was a good point to <br /> consider. <br /> Councilmember Willmus suggested letting the NB discussion flesh itself out be- <br /> fore additional things were pulled out of that. <br /> In that case, Mayor Roe opined if limiting it to RB, HDR-2 could apply and allow <br /> for more density in RB districts. Without objection, Mayor Roe suggested that <br /> HDR-2 standards apply for RB in Table 1005-1, unless staff preferred to give fur- <br /> ther consideration to possible ramifications. <br /> Mr. Paschke advised that he would prefer to give it further consideration; and <br /> from a process standpoint, confirmed that since it involved a text amendment to <br /> zoning code, would require a public hearing before the Planning Commission to <br /> address adding those standards. <br /> Without objection, council members expressed their preference to consider adop- <br /> tion of all standards and conditional uses at the same time. <br /> e. Consideration of Community Development Department Request to Perform <br /> an Abatement for Unresolved Violations of City Code at 756 Heinel Drive W <br /> As previously noted, code violations had been resolved prior to tonight's meeting. <br />