Laserfiche WebLink
Government Ethics and Social Media: Issues and Challenges <br />(L-R: Jason Baker, Irina Raicu, and David Vossbrink) <br />By Caroline Jaffe-Picl�ett <br />The ovei-�iding theme from the January 31st roundtable on social media and government at The <br />Ethics Center, is that of paradox. We have a multitude of ways to communicate with our <br />constituents, but this is proving to be a double edge "digital sword." Ethical dilemmas and issues <br />of transparency, accountability, and authenticity, were the focus for panelists Jason Balcer, Irina <br />Raicu, and David Vossbrinlc, before an audience of local elected officials from Silicon Valley <br />and the San Francisco Bay Area. <br />The following 6 principal dilemmas were discussed: <br />*Public vs. Private <br />In a culture �vhere all tweets are archived in the Library of Congress, and enough has been <br />written on Facebook privacy issues to fill a book, the public vs. private debate will be no doubt <br />be with us for some time. Are there any truly "private" posts or, for that matter, private social <br />media channels for elected officials, or is it simply a matter of time before that inevitable <br />disparaging tweet published months ago suddenly reappears? While politicians can expect a loss <br />of privacy as a right of passage in political success, a Facebook page for friends and family is not <br />unreasonable expectation...or is it? While the delicate balance between public and private sorts <br />itself out in social media's new deck of cards, caution and common sense are key. As Vossbrink <br />commented: "The best advice when posting can be gleaned from Microsoft's famous saying: <br />'Don't be stupid."' <br />*Speed vs. Accuracy <br />In this age of fast-forward news consumption, constituents expect rapid turnaround on the issues <br />from their elected officials. The need for speed increases the margin for error, while the cost of <br />being wrong raises the stakes. Many citizen journalists often "tweet without thinking," so elected <br />