My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016_0210_Ethics Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Ethics Commission
>
Packets
>
2016_0210_Ethics Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2017 9:08:02 AM
Creation date
10/10/2017 11:08:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Ethics Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, November 30, 2015 <br />Page 29 <br />Mayor Roe concurred, noting complaints would be received from the City Man- <br />ager or City Attorney as applicable to pass on to the ultimate decision-maker, still <br />the City Council. <br />Councilmember Etten asked if Mayor Roe still envisioned the Ethics Commission <br />meeting annually to discuss their responsibilities as an educational piece as they <br />understand their role in this situation or how they still functioned within the city. <br />Mayor Roe stated that wasn't a bad idea; and that would provide some orienta- <br />tion, unless that information was provided to commissions ahead of time to de- <br />termine commissioner interest in volunteering for that role. Mayor Roe stated it <br />would need defining what that role was if such a process was undertaken, such as <br />a one-time meeting to get to the basics or mechanics of that role. <br />Councilmember Laliberte stated she envisioned it as something added to the Uni- <br />form Commission Code for annual appointment by each commission to appoint <br />one person to serve in that capacity. <br />Mayor Roe suggested amending the Ethics Commission Code language to address <br />establishment and membership and potential term, but deferred comment on that <br />to staff or the City Attorney as to whether or not the Uniform Commission Code <br />was the appropriate place. <br />Councilmember McGehee stated her agreement with the orientation idea and <br />Councilmember Laliberte's idea whereby each commission packet would define a <br />process with members coming from those various commissions to provide that <br />function, along with a straightforward statement of how the City handled ethics <br />complaints and the process for doing so. Councilmember McGehee opined that <br />an additional benefit would be familiarizing one additional person on each com- <br />mission with ethics issues and the process involved. <br />Mayor Roe agreed that was a good point. <br />Councilmember Willmus stated he was intrigued by the idea and could find no <br />reservations at this time. <br />Mayor Roe suggested the next step would be to direct staff to return with pro- <br />posed code language. <br />City Manager Trudgeon duly noted that directive, requesting additional thought <br />on staff's part in how to translate that intent to code. <br />Without objection, Mayor Roe directed staff to review code language and recom- <br />mend a process telated to the concept of a standing Ethics Committee as outlined. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.