My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016_1003_Ethics Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Ethics Commission
>
Packets
>
2016_1003_Ethics Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2017 9:07:57 AM
Creation date
10/10/2017 11:10:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Ethics Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
opined that the proposed lot would be unbuildable and would not maintain the <br />neighborhood's characteristic lot sizes. <br />3. That Council Member Laliberte failure to agree with city staff's factual conclusions <br />resulted in her "malcing knowingly false statements" regarding the application. Even <br />though such an allegation does not implicate a specific consideration under Section 3 of <br />the Ethics Code, Mr. Koland complains that Laliberte purported false statements violate <br />the code due to Section 3 not providing an exhaustive list of ethical considerations. <br />With respect to Council Member McGehee, Mr. Koland alleges five (5) bases for ethical <br />violations: <br />l. That Council Member McGehee failed to be independent and impartial. As with <br />allegation #1 toward Council Member Laliberte, this accusation also appears to rely on <br />the preamble declared in the Code's "Declaration of Policy." Specifically, Mr. Koland <br />complains that McGehee's approval for a minor subdivision in a different neighborhood <br />that also experiences storm water run-off and drainage issues displayed a lack of <br />independence and impartiality. Further, Mr. Koland complains that McGehee's opinions <br />regarding the appropriateness of the subdivision in the Gluek Lane neighborhood and Mr. <br />Koland's motives for seeking a subdivision also displayed a lack of independence and <br />impartiality. <br />2. That Council Meinber McGehee failed to follow proper channels by, lilce Council <br />Member Laliberte, not acceding to city staff's factual conclusions. <br />3. That Council Member McGehee improperly used confidential information in violation of <br />Section 3.B. This section states: <br />"No Public Off'icial shall use information gained as a Public Of�'icial which is not <br />generally made available to and/or is not known to the public, to directly or <br />indirectly gain anything of value, or for the benefit of any other person or entity; <br />nor shall a Public Official make such information available when it would be <br />reasonably foreseeable that a person or entity would benefit from it." <br />Specifically, Mr. Koland complains that this violation arises from McGehee's statement <br />that "we have actually had homes whose basements have collapsed in that area due to <br />water issues that we have." (Quote taken from Mr. Koland's complaint.) There is no <br />further explanation as to how this comment contained confidential information. <br />4. That Council Member McGehee failed to act in compliance with laws under Section 3.N, <br />on the same grounds contained in allegation #2 toward Council Member Laliberte. <br />5. That, identical to allegation #3 toward Council Member Laliberte, Council Member <br />McGehee's failure to agree with city staff's factual conclusions resulted in her "making <br />knowingly false statements." <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.