My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2017_0925
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2017
>
CC_Minutes_2017_0925
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2017 11:11:11 AM
Creation date
10/19/2017 11:10:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/25/2017
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, September 25, 2017 <br /> Page 26 <br /> Mayor Roe, for the reasons stated for supporting the previous motion, stated that <br /> he would not support this motion to deny. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte stated that she would also not be voting in support of <br /> this motion to deny, as she saw it supporting a good use for the city's workforce. <br /> In her review of the original drafting of the PUD, Councilmember Laliberte <br /> opined that the city had creativity to amend it and thought it should do so. <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: Willmus, Etten and McGehee. <br /> Nays: Laliberte and Roe. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> Noting that this is the second request for a PUD amendment, Councilmember <br /> Willmus asked that a docket in the near future include discussion for replacement <br /> of this PUD. <br /> As to the process, Mayor Roe advised that staff and the City Attorney would be <br /> drafting these findings for denial and communicate them to the applicant. <br /> Under state law, City Attorney Gaughan advised that the findings would be draft- <br /> ed in written form and delivered to the applicant as soon as possible. City Attor- <br /> ney Gaughan further noted that, consistent with city practices, a formal resolution <br /> would be presented at the next City Council to memorialize those findings, all <br /> well within the 60-day review period as extended. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that originally it had been suggested to work through the status <br /> of PUD's as part of the comprehensive plan update process given the zoning as- <br /> pects involved. However, Mayor Roe noted that indications were that the City <br /> Council preferred that to happen more quickly. <br /> Without objection, City Manager Trudgeon was so directed. <br /> Recess <br /> Mayor Roe recessed the meeting at approximately 9:44 p.m., and reconvened at approximately <br /> 9:46 p.m. <br /> 8. Approve Minutes <br /> a. City Council Minutes—September 11 <br /> Etten moved, McGehee seconded, approval of the September 11, 2017 City <br /> Council Meeting Minutes as amended. <br /> Corrections: <br /> ■Page 14, Line 35 (Roe) <br /> Correct to read: "...exceed $625.00 unless completed by the owner[by] Octo- <br /> ber 15, 2017." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.