My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017_09-26_PWETCpacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2017
>
2017_09-26_PWETCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2017 12:10:59 PM
Creation date
12/8/2017 11:43:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
9/26/2017
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
578 trail. The City will then only have a smaller section to complete and it will get done <br />579 because it is an opportunity. <br />580 <br />581 Member Wozniak inquired if it will be hard to convince the City to spend money <br />582 on something if it is lower on the priority list. <br />583 <br />584 Chair Cihacek suggested they call it a preference list, not a priority list. It should <br />585 be seen as a tool for staff to determine how they should allocate their time and <br />586 resources. <br />587 <br />588 Mr. Freihammer commented they may have missed a few points with the diagonal <br />589 connection and it should be ranked higher. <br />590 <br />591 Member Wozniak stated it only gets one point for a gap. The only gap may be a <br />592 local roadway even though it is a regional system. <br />593 <br />594 Mr. Culver stated before the neat meeting, he will take comments from the July <br />595 meeting and make recommendations to the policies and standards. He will provide <br />596 these recommendations to the Commission in advance of the neat meeting and <br />597 requested they provide feedback on it. He will then take this feedback and integrate <br />598 it into a document that will be part of the packet for the September meeting. <br />599 <br />600 7. Items for Next Meeting — September 26, 2017 <br />601 Discussion ensued regarding the September PWETC agenda and time required for <br />602 each item: <br />603 • Discussion on utility base rates with an estimated time requirement of 15 <br />604 minutes <br />605 • Transportation Pathway Master Plan policies and standards continued <br />606 discussion and review <br />607 • Summary of the PWETC and City Council joint meeting <br />608 • Possible discussion on the Transportation Plan <br />609 <br />610 Mr. Culver stated the Council requested they look at the utility base rates from <br />611 residential users to commercial users. They will provide scenarios at the neat <br />612 meeting for feedback from the Commission. <br />613 <br />614 Member Misra commented the tour was very good. <br />615 <br />616 Mr. Culver thanked the Members that made it to the tour of the Twin Lakes Area <br />617 and stated it will be posted on the website. <br />618 <br />619 8. Adjourn <br />620 <br />621 Motion <br />622 Member Thurnau moved, Member Trainor seconded, adjournment of the <br />623 meeting at approximately 8:37 p.m. <br />Page 14 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.