My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017_10-24_PWETCpacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2017
>
2017_10-24_PWETCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2017 2:12:49 PM
Creation date
12/8/2017 1:47:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/24/2017
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Rates for si e -family are per housing unit; all others are per acre <br />NIPM 2017 2018 <br />Recycling Rate Category Rate Rate Comments <br />Single -Family $ 6.50 $ 7.00 Standard rate <br />103 Multi -Family 6.50 7.00 Standard rate <br />104 <br />105 Water Usage History <br />106 The series of graphs presented below depict water customer consumption patterns over the past 10 years <br />107 beginning with a depiction of the citywide water consumption. <br />108 <br />1,800,000 — <br />1,600,000 <br />1,400,000 <br />1,200,000 <br />1,000,000 <br />800,000 <br />600,000 <br />400,000 <br />200,000 <br />109 <br />Citywide Water Usage (000's gals.) <br />2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 <br />110 <br />111 As indicated in the graph, citywide consumption has generally been falling over the past decade — a 23% <br />112 reduction since 2007. This has allowed the City's usage rates to remain unchanged since 2015 despite <br />113 increases in the cost of purchasing water from St. Paul. <br />114 <br />115 Rate Comparisons <br />116 The graphs below depict a number of water and sewer rate comparisons with other peer communities. <br />117 For this analysis, peer communities include 1st ring suburbs that serve a population between 18,000 and <br />118 50,000, and which are not simply an extension of a larger entity's system (e.g. Maplewood is excluded <br />119 because they're part of St. Paul's system). This group was selected to try and approximate cities with <br />120 stand-alone systems with similar age of infrastructure which can have a significant influence on the cost <br />121 of water and sewer services. <br />122 <br />Page 6 of 9 <br />2017 <br />2018 <br />Stormwater Base Rate Category <br />Rate <br />Rate <br />Comments <br />Single -Family Residential & Duplex <br />$ 12.95 <br />$ 13.35 <br />Standard SF rate <br />_Multi -Family & Churches <br />100.35 <br />103.35 <br />Standard SF rate x 7.75 <br />Cemeteries & Golf Course <br />9.75 <br />10.05 <br />Standard SF rate x 0.75 <br />Parks <br />30.20 <br />31.10 <br />Standard SF rate x 2.35 <br />Schools & Community Centers <br />48.80 <br />50.25 <br />Standard SF rate x 3.75 <br />Commercial & Industrial <br />200.55 <br />206.55 <br />Standard SF rate x 15.50 <br />Rates for si e -family are per housing unit; all others are per acre <br />NIPM 2017 2018 <br />Recycling Rate Category Rate Rate Comments <br />Single -Family $ 6.50 $ 7.00 Standard rate <br />103 Multi -Family 6.50 7.00 Standard rate <br />104 <br />105 Water Usage History <br />106 The series of graphs presented below depict water customer consumption patterns over the past 10 years <br />107 beginning with a depiction of the citywide water consumption. <br />108 <br />1,800,000 — <br />1,600,000 <br />1,400,000 <br />1,200,000 <br />1,000,000 <br />800,000 <br />600,000 <br />400,000 <br />200,000 <br />109 <br />Citywide Water Usage (000's gals.) <br />2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 <br />110 <br />111 As indicated in the graph, citywide consumption has generally been falling over the past decade — a 23% <br />112 reduction since 2007. This has allowed the City's usage rates to remain unchanged since 2015 despite <br />113 increases in the cost of purchasing water from St. Paul. <br />114 <br />115 Rate Comparisons <br />116 The graphs below depict a number of water and sewer rate comparisons with other peer communities. <br />117 For this analysis, peer communities include 1st ring suburbs that serve a population between 18,000 and <br />118 50,000, and which are not simply an extension of a larger entity's system (e.g. Maplewood is excluded <br />119 because they're part of St. Paul's system). This group was selected to try and approximate cities with <br />120 stand-alone systems with similar age of infrastructure which can have a significant influence on the cost <br />121 of water and sewer services. <br />122 <br />Page 6 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.