Laserfiche WebLink
147 <br />148 <br />149 <br />150 <br />151 <br />152 <br />153 <br />154 <br />155 <br />156 <br />157 <br />158 <br />159 <br />160 <br />161 <br />2017 Sewer Fee Comparison: SF Residential <br />$100 <br />$80 <br />$60 <br />$40 <br />ej <br />Gti 5w• Cy° 5° °° <br />In this comparison, Roseville sewer charges were less than the median and average for the group. <br />To get a broader perspective, the following chart has been prepared depicting the combined water and <br />sewer impact for a typical single-family home for the comparison group. <br />2017 Water & Sewer Fee Comparison: SFResidentlal <br />$180 <br />$160 <br />$140 <br />$120 <br />$100 <br />$80 4- <br />��o°tiro~ UINP <br />G <br />When combined, Roseville is approximately 15% above the average for the peer group. <br />It should be noted that most of the cities shown in the chart that have lower water & sewer rates, happen <br />to have much higher property tax rates. This is an important distinction because again, each City employs <br />a different philosophy in how it funds the direct and indirect costs of providing water & sewer services. <br />162 Roseville's philosophy is to ensure that all indirect costs are reflected in the water and sewer rates. This <br />163 results in higher water and sewer rates. This also means that we don't have as many indirect costs being <br />164 supported by the property tax or assessments. <br />Page 8 of 9 <br />