Laserfiche WebLink
261 Chair Cihacek stated by how they have defined pathway, everyone is within one - <br />262 quarter mile of one. He inquired if they need to make item No. 6 more specific. <br />263 <br />264 Mr. Culver suggested they say "off-road pathway" so that people have an accessible <br />265 off road option within areasonable distance from their home. It applies to anywhere <br />266 in the City, not just residential. <br />267 <br />268 Chair Cihacek inquired if it is feasible to have an off-road pathway within one <br />269 quarter mile of anywhere in the City. They need to make this policy more specific <br />270 by either defining the pathway or the property to make it feasible. <br />271 <br />272 Member Misra commented a policy is intended to stand for some time. If there is <br />273 transition or redevelopment in a certain area, the policy still guides how the area is <br />274 expected to be redeveloped. <br />275 <br />276 Mr. Hingeveld stated in the scoring criteria they developed, they did try to use a <br />277 one quarter mile distance to rank and score connections. <br />278 h& <br />279 Mr. Culver stated it makes sense to keep one quarter mile as the goal. It might not <br />280 be feasible, but they will try to get as close as possible. <br />281 <br />282 Chair Cihacek stated they should keep it in, but it is not a great policy. <br />283 <br />284 Mr. Culver confirmed they will keep it in with the red modified language. <br />285 <br />286 Mr. Hingeveld stated they clean up language referring to light traffic. This section <br />287 is clear and helped with the ranking criteria. <br />288 <br />289 Item 5.5. Provide public access to school facilities/grounds (i.e. running track). <br />290 Mr. Culver stated Member Trainor made a good point that the high school running <br />291 track will not always be open to the general public. It is still important to connect <br />292 pathways to schools, and suggested they omit the parenthesis with the running track <br />293 example, but keep the rest of item No. 7.5 as is. The Commission agreed. <br />294 <br />295 Item 10.1 Share the Pathwav Master Plan with representatives of these various <br />296 groups. <br />297 He referred to a highlighted area that states, "Make the Pathway Master Plan <br />298 publicly available to interested parties and stakeholders through multiple means and <br />299 mediums." This would replace the current wording for item No. 10.1. <br />300 <br />301 After discussion, the Commission agreed to have it changed to, "Make the Pathway <br />302 Master Plan publicly available through multiple means and mediums." <br />303 <br />304 Item 10.2. When projects are implemented, representatives for the impacted groups <br />305 will be consulted before plans are finalized. <br />Page 7 of 14 <br />