My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017-08-22_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2017
>
2017-08-22_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2017 2:57:51 PM
Creation date
12/8/2017 2:57:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
8/22/2017
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
399 <br />Addresses a gap or barrier in the transportation network. <br />400 <br />Mr. Hingeveld explained this item looks at completing a gap that shows high <br />401 <br />demand and is set up along the roadway system. These pathways priorities are <br />402 <br />shown on arterial and higher functioning roads. An example would be the HarMar <br />403 <br />to Rosedale connection where a grade separated trail may be proposed. They used <br />404 <br />a framework based on readily available data, but things could be adjusted. <br />405 <br />406 <br />Connects to Transit. <br />407 <br />Mr. Hingeveld explained this may complete gaps from a residential neighborhood <br />408 <br />to a nearby Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) station. <br />409 <br />410 <br />Connects high-density residential to transit or parks. <br />411 <br />Mr. Hingeveld stated this item is also related to transit, but adds a high density <br />412 <br />element. It considers if it is serving the higher populations that have more of a need <br />413 <br />to use the pathways. <br />414 <br />415 <br />Chair Cihacek inquired why 100 units versus 10 units. <br />416 <br />417 <br />Mr. Freihammer responded based on the data, they broke it out based on how many <br />418 <br />units there were. They included amax of five points, but that can be changed. They <br />419 <br />have data on how many units are in a certain apartment complex. Some corridors <br />420 <br />had 500 apartment units near them. In the original analysis, it was one point if they <br />421 <br />had units within one-quarter mile, and two points for additional units within one - <br />422 <br />eighth of a mile. They decided there should be a bonus for units that have a lot <br />423 <br />higher density. A lot of them will end up maxing out at five points and they did not <br />424 <br />want to rate it too high because it already has some points if it is connected to a bus <br />425 <br />stop. <br />426 <br />427 <br />Chair Cihacek inquired how many apartment complexes have 100 units. <br />428 <br />429 <br />Mr. Culver stated there has to be at least 100 units in order to get the credit of high <br />430 <br />density. There are quite a few developments in Roseville that have over 100 units. <br />431 <br />432 <br />Chair Cihacek stated this scoring rubric accommodates senior citizens with the high <br />433 <br />density senior housing. <br />434 <br />435 <br />Mr. Freihammer commented this looked at senior housing facilities, apartment <br />436 <br />facilities, and condo units. <br />437 <br />438 <br />Member Misra stated if there is going to be growth in Roseville, it is going to have <br />439 <br />to go up and this is getting at what is important. <br />440 <br />441 <br />Member Heimerl inquired about the rank in the last column and what the red letters <br />442 <br />meant. <br />Page 10 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.