My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2017_1204
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2017
>
CC_Minutes_2017_1204
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/20/2017 10:34:44 AM
Creation date
12/20/2017 9:25:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
12/4/2017
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, December 4, 2017 <br /> Page 4 <br /> Finance Director Miller responded that assessments were one issue, but stated that <br /> he was unable to actually define each city's philosophy for utility rate structures. <br /> Mr. Miller did note that the rate was dependent on water sourcing for each city, <br /> whether they provided softened water such as is done in Roseville, and other vari- <br /> ables beyond assessments. Mr. Miller advised that the City of Roseville's philos- <br /> ophy had been and continued to be, to capture all direct and a majority of indirect <br /> costs involved in providing each utility operation. Mr. Miller advised that he re- <br /> search those variables for future annual budget presentations to provide a clearer <br /> picture. <br /> At the request of Councilmember McGehee, Finance Director Miller offered to <br /> provide additional information on capital improvement program (CIP) funds spe- <br /> cifically set-aside in 2018 and future years for the new Cedarholm Golf Course <br /> clubhouse currently under construction. <br /> Specific to Attachment C, projecting 2017 budget surpluses or deficits for key op- <br /> erating funds, Councilmember Etten asked Finance Director Miller for further de- <br /> tails on projected cash reserves in the General Fund and how that varied from that <br /> presented in September of 2017. Councilmember Etten referenced a recent email <br /> communication from staff to the City Council reflecting donation dollars for <br /> 2017. <br /> Finance Director Miller advised that Attachment C and its projections were cur- <br /> rent as of November 22, 2017 for key operating funds, with a small margin of er- <br /> ror possible. Mr. Miller noted that, embedded in cash reserves in the first col- <br /> umns were included donations for the Parks & Recreation, Police and Fire De- <br /> partments representing implied pledges and their use for the intent monies were <br /> given. For the purpose of this exercise, Mr. Miller advised that those "pledged" <br /> donations had been removed resulting in the fourth column "Less Donations," a <br /> new column this year to further assist the City Council in refining their considera- <br /> tion of use of reserve funds. <br /> In looking at 2017 General Fund cash reserves projected at approximately $6 mil- <br /> lion, Councilmember Etten asked where that fit into reserve level targets. <br /> Finance Director Miller responded that, with a margin for error, he projected an <br /> approximately $650,000 cushion before hitting the 35% target goal if the $6 mil- <br /> lion figure was used, noting approximately $781,000 budgeted in programmed <br /> use of General Funds reserves. However, Mr. Miller advised that the city typical- <br /> ly budgeted for full employment, but opined that would probably not occur, al- <br /> lowing for approximately $500,000 in deficit spending based on the projected <br /> 2018 budget. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.