My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2017_1204
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2017
>
CC_Minutes_2017_1204
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/20/2017 10:34:44 AM
Creation date
12/20/2017 9:25:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
12/4/2017
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, December 4, 2017 <br /> Page 7 <br /> may be an important consideration, when he looked at the number of burglaries <br /> reported in Police Department reports and their annual run rate of 200 plus per <br /> year with each having the potential for loss of lives, asked if some consideration <br /> had been given to allocating money in the operating budget for more police pa- <br /> trols to address Roseville burglaries, whether residential or commercial. <br /> From the perspective of financial management, Mr. Trovato suggested further <br /> consideration of releasing additional reserve funds in 2018 to further hold down <br /> taxes as much as possible and then rebuild them in 2019 and going forward. <br /> With no one else appearing to speak, Mayor Roe closed the public hearing at ap- <br /> proximately 7:21 p.m. <br /> Mayor Roe clarified that no action was intended tonight, intentionally allowing <br /> time for the City Council to reflect on public hearing comments and final adop- <br /> tion next week. Mayor Roe sought any additional information requests from in- <br /> dividual council members to staff before that adoption. Also, Mayor Roe refer- <br /> enced various relief programs available for taxpayers ad provided by Finance Di- <br /> rector Miller during his presentation, and directed residents toward the application <br /> process. <br /> Council Deliberation <br /> Councilmember McGehee specifically asked Councilmember Willmus his inten- <br /> tions related to options or impacts he may be considering or prepared to propose <br /> for final levy and budget adoption at this time, asking that he share them now to <br /> allow consideration by his colleagues rather than bringing them forward from the <br /> bench at next week's meeting without time for broader deliberation. <br /> Councilmember Willmus recognized the 6.4% increase proposed for the 2018 <br /> levy at this time. When talking about median value homes and impacts to them, <br /> Councilmember Willmus opined that this led to interesting conversations, but at <br /> the same time didn't provide actual impacts for property owners. <br /> In response to Councilmember McGehee's question, Councilmember Willmus <br /> advised that he didn't have an actual proposal formulated or ready to share at this <br /> time; but admitted that he was intrigued by the recommendations made by the Fi- <br /> nance Commission, providing an option in addition to that presented by Mayor <br /> Roe earlier tonight. <br /> Councilmember Willmus stated that his real concern was with the city's history of <br /> setting its annual levy at a certain percentage for increase that then became the <br /> base for going forward. If that trend continued, Councilmember Willmus opined <br /> that future councils would be presented with a difficult conversation related to <br /> levies if and when the city didn't have a commercial tax base to make up the dif- <br /> ference. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.