Laserfiche WebLink
Long-term debt. At the end of the current fiscal year, the City of Roseville had total <br />long-term debt outstanding of $37,135,000. <br />In March, 2013 the City issued $3.98 million in general obligation refunding bonds to <br />refinance the debt originally issued to construct an expansion of City Ha1L In addition, <br />the City also has long-term liabilities in the amount of $1,481,262 for compensated <br />absences and $687,076 for the net obligation for OPEB. <br />City of Roseville's Outstanding Debt - <br />General Obligation Improvement Bonds and Certificates of Indebtedness <br />General obligation <br />Improvement bonds <br />General obligation <br />Municipal bonds <br />Cexrificates of <br />lndebtedness <br />Tota1 Outstanding Debt <br />Governmental Governmental Business-Type Business-Type <br />Acrivities Acriviries Acriviries Activiries Total Total <br />2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012 <br />$ 225,000 $ 435,000 $ <br />35,385,000 32,150,000 <br />- $ 225,000 $ 435,000 <br />- 35,385,000 32,150,000 <br />1,525,000 1,800,000 - - 1,525,000 1,800,000 <br />$ 37,135,000 $ 34,385,000 $ - $ - $ 37,135,000 $ 34,385,000 <br />The City of Roseville maintains an Aaa rating from Moody's and an AAA from Standard <br />and Poor's on all of its general obligation debt. <br />Minnesota State statutes limit the amount of general obligation debt a ciry may issue to <br />3% of total Estimated Market Value. The current debt limitation for the City of Roseville <br />is $112,055,907. $35,755,000 of the Ciry's outstanding debt is counted against the <br />statutory limitation as the debt is wholly financed by a general tax levy. <br />Additional information on the Ciry of Roseville's long-term debt can be found in Note 1- <br />D on page 50 of this report, and Note 4-G on pages 61-63. <br />Economic Factors and next year's Budgets and Rates <br />A number of local economic factors played a role in setting next year's Budget and utility <br />rates: <br />❖ The City made operational adjustments in recognition of declining interest <br />earnings and stagnant non-tax revenues. <br />❖ Recreation program fees were increased to reflect the rising costs of individual <br />programs. In addition, user charges for proprietary funds were also changed to <br />reflect current and anticipated conditions and asset replacement needs. <br />These factors were considered when the City of Roseville prepared its 2014 budget. <br />24 <br />