Laserfiche WebLink
Interviews with recycling experts located in the metropolitan area were conducted to gain an <br />understanding of how different organics recycling programs are implemented (Table 1). <br />Questions regarding overall implementation status of their organics program, funding options, <br />program costs, and citizen participation were asked (Appendix A). Interviews with Fridley, Elk <br />River, St. Louis Park, Minneapolis, and St. Paul staff members contributed information to each <br />case study, while all interviews informed the recommendations in this report. <br />Eureka Recycling is currently the City of Roseville's organized recycling hauler. An interview <br />of a staff member from Eureka Recycling was conducted to gain a contextual understanding of <br />organics waste transportation and processing (Appendix C). <br />The primary challenge associated with conducting the interviews was time constraints. The <br />project only spanned three months, therefore limiting the number of interviews conducted and <br />the ability to re -interview staff for more in-depth information. <br />Case Studies <br />Five case studies were used to evaluate the success and effectiveness of existing organics <br />programs implemented in municipalities that are similar to the City of Roseville. Case study <br />findings informed the organics recycling program recommendations in this report. Three of the <br />municipalities selected for the analysis were from the Minneapolis - St. Paul metropolitan area, <br />similar in population size to Roseville, and had implemented an organics recycling program. <br />The three municipalities with distinct programs were Elk River, St. Louis Park, and Fridley. <br />Although Minneapolis and St. Paul differ from Roseville in geographic and population size, <br />they were incorporated as case studies because both of these cities have well established <br />organics recycling programs. Each type of organics recycling program was represented across <br />these five municipalities. The programs included drop-off sites for organics, commingled Blue <br />Bag collection, and source separated curbside cart collection. <br />The primary metrics used to assess the municipalities' organics recycling programs included <br />program costs, outreach methods, and resident participation (Table 2). An interview with a <br />representative from each municipality was conducted to obtain qualitative data for each of the <br />key program aspects in the case study (Appendix A). All representatives were directly involved <br />in the organics recycling program for their respective municipality. Interviews were conducted <br />in person, by phone, or via email correspondence. <br />Table 2. Case study metrics and rationale for selection in the organics waste recycling study for <br />Roseville, Minnesota, 2017. <br />Program Costs <br />Outreach Methods <br />Resident Participation <br />Rationale Determine program costs for <br />Determine common <br />Determine level of <br />residents and city <br />outreach methods <br />resident participation in <br />used to increase <br />organics recycling <br />participation <br />programs <br />Examples of Cart or kit costs, service <br />Mailer, signage, <br />Current participation <br />Information initiation fees, hauler service <br />emails, workshops, <br />rates <br />fees, cost of supplies (bags) <br />etc. <br />Time constraints were the greatest limiting factor associated with this method. Schedule <br />coordination and execution of interviews are both inherently time intensive research <br />techniques. These time constraints restricted the municipal sample size. <br />