My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2018_01-23_PWETCpacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2018
>
2018_01-23_PWETCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2018 11:00:34 AM
Creation date
2/9/2018 10:55:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/23/2018
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(Figure 2). The intent of the drop-off site evaluation was to assign a score to each location <br />based on a set of uniform evaluation criteria within five evaluation categories (Appendix E). <br />Assigning scores to the qualitative observations made at each site provided a quantifiable basis <br />of comparison of the evaluation criteria and categories for the potential organics recycling <br />drop-off site locations. <br />Each site was visited and evaluated by each of the five evaluators. Both criterion within each <br />of the five evaluation categories were assigned a yes or no response based on observations <br />made at the site. In preparation for analysis, the yes/no responses were assigned a binary score <br />of 1 or 0 as was previously described in the methodologies section of this report (Appendix F). <br />A category score of two indicated that the site received the maximum number of points possible <br />and fully met both criterion for the category. On the contrary, a category score of zero indicated <br />that the site received no points and did not meet either of the criterion for the category. A <br />category score of one indicated that one of the two criteria was fully met while the other was <br />not met. Higher category scores increased the suitability of the site, while lower category scores <br />diminished site suitability. No partial points were awarded. All categories were equally <br />weighted. <br />Dale Street Leaf Recycling Center <br />The first location evaluated was the Dale Street Leaf Recycling Center located on the east side <br />of Dale Street and south of County Road C (Figure 2). The site scored highest in the <br />accessibility category, followed closely by parking/traffic, then walkability, and finally <br />security and site characteristics (Figure 3). An overall score was assigned to the site by <br />aggregating the category scores provided by each evaluator. The site aggregate scores ranged <br />from two to seven and the average of the scores was 4.8 points out of a possible 10 points <br />(Figure 4). <br />Review of additional observational notes recorded during site evaluations showed that four of <br />the five evaluators noted potential problems associated with muddy conditions at the site <br />(Appendix F) <br />Average Category Score by Site <br />2 <br />2 <br />2 2 <br />_' <br />2 2 <br />I.s <br />i <br />h <br />1.6 <br />0 <br />11 <br />I <br />b I <br />`u <br />10.2 <br />0.8 <br />Q <br />0.� <br />0.2 <br />n <br />Accessibility Security Parking/Traffic Site Characteristics Walkability <br />Criteria categories <br />■ Dale Street Leaf Recycling Center a Victoria Ballfields a Dale Street Soccer Fields <br />Figure 3. Average drop-off site evaluation category score by site. Roseville, <br />Minnesota, 2017. <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.