Laserfiche WebLink
structure into the wastewater system. The FSE or FM/P bears the burden of <br />demonstrating that the installation of a grease interceptor is not feasible. The request for <br />an exemption shall include the following information if relevant: <br />1. Evidence of a lack of available exterior space necessary to place an interceptor <br />relative to the location of sewer main and easement: <br />2. Evidence of a lack of adequate slope for gravity flow between kitchen plumbing <br />fixtures in the FSE or FM/P and the wastewater facilities: <br />3. Description and specifications of the alternative grease control equipment that will <br />be installed: <br />4. Evidence that the size, available seating or type of food preparation does not <br />generate any significant volume of FOG. <br />M. Charge for remedial maintenance or repair of the citV wastewater sVstem. <br />1. In the event that the owner of an FSE or FM/P or the owner of any structure in <br />which an FSE or FM/P is located is found to have contributed to the partial or <br />complete obstruction of a wastewater facility resulting from the discharge of <br />wastewater or waste containing FOG and that the city is required to act <br />immediately to control a public health hazard because of such blockage, such <br />owner shall be required to reimburse the city for all costs of abating such <br />condition. In situations where there are multiple owners identified as contributing <br />to FOG causing such obstruction, the Public Works Director will apportion the <br />cost of the cleanup, maintenance or repair costs on a prorated basis, based on <br />each owner's percentage share of the average total sanitary sewer charges for all <br />such owners. Further, should inspection, testing or other sampling activity by the <br />city confirm that any user is contributing excessive FOG (including other harmful <br />ingredients) and is causing the repair or extraordinary maintenance activity to <br />maintain the integrity of the system, the Public Works Driector may require <br />retrofitting of the structure with grease interceptors or grease traps, including <br />testing facilities and access thereto sufficient to resolve the problem: <br />2. The costs for curing any private sewer lateral failures and sewer system <br />overflows, including cleaning and other maintenance, caused in whole or in part <br />by FOG introduced into the wastewater treatment facilities by any FSE or FM/P, <br />alone or in conjunction with any other party, are the responsibility of the owner of <br />the FSE or FM/P and the owner of any structure in which the FSE or FM/P <br />contributing the FOG to wastewater system is located. <br />N. Compliance. <br />Compliance with the grease control program shall be evaluated based on the <br />following criteria: <br />1. All food service establishments who are implementing and documenting BMPs <br />[including employee training and kitchen proceduresl and performing and <br />documenting grease retention unit cleaning at the required frequency will be <br />considered to be in full compliance with this policy. <br />2. When an obstruction and/or sanitary sewer overflow occur, the records of all FSE <br />or FM/P that discharge to the affected sanitary sewer line may be reviewed in <br />order to determine the responsible party. Any FSE or FM/P found to be in <br />noncompliance with the required grease retention unit cleaning frequency shall be <br />deemed a "responsible party" for cost recovery. Payment of cost recovery does <br />not preclude further enforcement actions for noncompliance as per the FOG <br />enforcement response plan. <br />O. Penalties and assessments for FOG program noncompliance. In the event that the owner <br />of an FSE or FM/P or the owner of any structure in which an FSE or FM/P is located is <br />