My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2018-01-23_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2018
>
2018-01-23_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2018 2:22:38 PM
Creation date
2/28/2018 2:22:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/23/2018
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
538 Chair Cihacek suggested they include a link or reference. <br />539 <br />540 Member Seigler inquired if they should add something about holding energy in the <br />541 house. <br />542 <br />543 Mr. Culver stated they do not want to be that specific. They will keep item 1.4 more <br />544 vague with renewable energies and emerging technologies. <br />545 <br />546 Chair Cihacek commented this document is covering strategies and it will be <br />547 addressed somewhere else. <br />548 <br />549 Member Wozniak noted they can reference emerging technologies as a blanket <br />550 statement, similar to transportation. <br />551 <br />552 Page 14 — Environmental Education and Outreach. <br />553 Under Policies, Chair Cihacek inquired why they included local school districts as <br />554 a local unit of government and not the watershed district. <br />555 <br />556 Mr. Culver stated the watershed districts could be included under regional <br />557 governments agencies. <br />558 <br />559 Chair Cihacek suggested it be changed to "Partner with other governmental <br />560 agencies..." rather than name them. He also suggested they add more proactive <br />561 strategies rather than simply communicating, such as, "Develop and plan education <br />562 events regarding resilience and environmental protection..." <br />563 <br />564 Mr. Culver suggested item 1.1 be changed to "Sponsor and/or host resilience <br />565 education and environmental stewardship programs." <br />566 <br />567 Member Wozniak read some comments that were not included in the draft. Under <br />568 building standards, it was suggested, "The City will lead by example to build and <br />569 maintain structures that are energy efficient, accessible, have reduced maintenance <br />570 costs, and that identify Roseville as a progressive sustainable City." <br />571 <br />572 Chair Cihacek stated this could be included as a separate bullet point under energy <br />573 efficiency. <br />574 <br />575 Mr. Culver noted this was more specific to anything the City builds or remodels in <br />576 the future by pushing themselves to provide a higher standard. <br />577 <br />578 Member Wozniak explained the new parks buildings are beautiful, but their design <br />579 and orientation is not conducive to solar. <br />580 <br />581 Member Seigler stated they could try to build them in compliance with LEED <br />582 certification or Green Step Cities. <br />583 <br />Page 13 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.