Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, February 12, 2018 <br /> Page 11 <br /> Councilmember Etten suggested the City has been focusing on taking care of cur- <br /> rent assets. This would be a significant new asset in the City. Maybe this can be <br /> included every-other survey. <br /> Councilmember Willmus added this is a different scenario than replacing an exist- <br /> ing building, as it would be a new endeavor. <br /> The Council agreed to remove questions 33 and 34 from the survey and revisit <br /> those questions in two years. <br /> Mr. Bowman brought up question 69 next, and the Council agreed to remove it, as <br /> the City no longer offers the workshops: <br /> 69. Prior to this survey, were you aware of the "home sweet home" <br /> workshops? <br /> Councilmember Etten suggested listing some of the specific City programs as part <br /> of question 68, as a way to educate the public, such as construction consultation <br /> and energy efficiency checks: <br /> 68. Prior to this survey, were you aware of this [residential home im- <br /> provement] housing program? <br /> The Council concurred. <br /> Next, Mr. Bowman brought up questions 87 through 96, which relate to the City's <br /> recycling program: <br /> 87. Do you participate in the curbside recycling program by separat- <br /> ing recycling items from the rest of your garbage? <br /> 88. Could you tell me one or two reasons why your household does <br /> not participate in the curbside recycling program? <br /> 89. Are there any changes or improvements in the service which <br /> could be made to induce you to participate in it? <br /> 90. How often do you put out recyclables out for collection — every <br /> two weeks, monthly, or less often? <br /> 91. Would you favor or oppose a change to an every week collection <br /> schedule for recyclables? <br /> 92. Would you still favor a change to an every week recycling collec- <br /> tion if it increased your costs? <br />