Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, February 12, 2018 <br /> Page 20 <br /> Councilmember McGehee asked whether that means it would be a conditional <br /> approval starting at 65 but would not allow anything higher than 100 feet. <br /> Councilmember Willmus responded that as a use, it is a conditional approval; <br /> then the question becomes why have a cap at 120 feet. <br /> Mayor Roe added that on the multi-family, the cap is 65 feet unless there is a <br /> conditional approval to go higher. There is no cap to that, theoretically. <br /> Councilmember McGehee stated she is trying to understand the difference be- <br /> tween the 65 feet or the 100 feet on a conditional use. She asked why the 100 feet <br /> would be a hard cap if the 65 feet is not. <br /> Mayor Roe stated one place says 65 feet or more with conditional approval. And <br /> here, the language says 120 feet or 100 feet as a hard cap; there is no option for <br /> conditional approval of any greater height. The Council may have to revisit this. <br /> Councilmember Willmus added the public safety aspect is important, particularly <br /> whether the City has the means by which to proactively handle a situation that re- <br /> sults in a building that is of significantly higher height than anywhere in the City. <br /> He fully trusts Chief O'Neil to say the department can handle it. But at some <br /> point, he is worried, with the current apparatus currently in place, about the ability <br /> to mitigate or manage those situations. <br /> Mayor Roe stated he is not sure there is an apparatus higher than 100 feet. In <br /> large metropolitan areas, the fire departments are not limiting building height <br /> based upon ladder trucks. <br /> City Manager Trudgeon suggested changing the height to 100 feet and keeping <br /> the setbacks in there. It is already a conditional use to allow for greater or lesser <br /> setbacks on a case-by-case basis. That would give staff a basis to move forward. <br /> Councilmember McGehee stated she would support that proposal. She supported <br /> this because Roseville is pretty much a suburban community, and that is a more <br /> appropriate scale. <br /> Councilmember Etten stated he trusts Chief O'Neil and the Roseville Fire De- <br /> partment to save people,just'as they do in taller buildings in Minneapolis or New <br /> York City. But the community standard of what is appropriate for Roseville is the <br /> issue. He is okay with 100 feet. He would like to look at the setback from single- <br /> family. If that means the Council looks at it for this and the HDR-2 piece, that is <br /> okay. They should be in lock-step with each other. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that the language in front of the Council tonight is consistent <br /> with the current HDR district ordinance language. The City can consider greater <br />