My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2018-02-27_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2018
>
2018-02-27_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2018 9:58:13 AM
Creation date
3/30/2018 9:56:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
2/27/2018
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
keep tabs on what is going on and have input. They also defined small cell wireless <br />and described how different installations can be done. <br />Mr. Culver explained the industry is changing how they are deploying the <br />technology. Wireless providers want to deploy and co -locate in the City's right of <br />way on light and traffic signal poles. The State granted them the right to be there <br />and the City is now updating the code to align with the new State Statutes. They <br />are expecting a lot of these when they begin to roll out 5G. They are currently using <br />it to cover gaps in 4G coverage. <br />Member Trainor inquired if the new language reflects what other cities are doing <br />regarding easements on County and State projects and if it slows the contractors <br />down. <br />Mr. Freihammer responded it requires the contractor to get two permits instead of <br />one, but it should not slow them down. <br />Mr. Culver stated the language is not the same as every City. They used Maple <br />Grove's language because they required permits on County right of ways and there <br />are a lot of examples where it was helpful. If they see someone working in the <br />City's right of way, this will allow them to look them up and make sure they have <br />a permit. <br />Member Misra inquired if this is an area where they can be more restrictive than <br />the State. <br />Mr. Culver responded they can be more restrictive in some ways, but there are <br />provisions in the law they cannot compromise. <br />Chair Cihacek inquired what the recommended permit fee was. <br />Mr. Freihammer responded it will probably be a flat fee of $25.00 to $50.00. <br />Chair Cihacek inquired who has permitting authority. <br />Mr. Culver stated the County has permitting authority. If the City wanted a permit <br />denied, they would have to work through the County. <br />Mr. Freihammer noted this gives them the opportunity to comment. <br />Chair Cihacek inquired if there was a way to simply carry the County permit into <br />the City's system so that they do not need to reapply. It seems like this is a <br />communication problem more than it is a structural problem. <br />Page 10 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.