My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2018_0221_HRIEC Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Human Rights, Inclusion and Engagement Commission
>
Packets
>
2018
>
2018_0221_HRIEC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2018 1:45:46 PM
Creation date
5/10/2018 9:12:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Human Rights Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
2/21/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment A <br /> *To continue to be more and better informed with community concerns and policing concerns; <br /> to learn more about issues in Roseville and how they are being addressed. /was enlightened <br /> with a lot of what/had not known or was aware of. <br /> *To engage in dialogue and hear more about issues in Roseville. Was very informative. <br /> *Interested in developing amore just society. Good conversation. <br /> *It's important to be engaged. <br /> *I'm concerned about fair treatment of everyone in Roseville. My expectations are partially met. <br /> *Care about our community and understand/know our police dept. <br /> *To get more info on policing actions related to people of color and immigrants. <br /> *I was interested to hear the chief and Lt. speak.They provided more authoritative information <br /> on law enforcement than in other community meetings. <br /> *Wanted to know how the Roseville police department is doing with responses to race, mental <br /> health, and etc. issues.Satisfied with what/heard. <br /> All except one respondent answered question one in the evaluation.The italicized remarks are <br /> the answers to the second part of the question as written. <br /> Appendix 2 <br /> What could have been done to improve/make it better? <br /> *1 think it was done well. Kudos to Chief and Lt.; well spoken. Genuine. <br /> *Microphone check before start. Refreshments at both ends of room. <br /> *Well done. <br /> *Youth involvement. <br /> *Perhaps include a third officer with a different background and perspective. <br /> *Done well; liked the facilitation by Marquita <br /> *No suggestions for improvement. <br /> *More topics, less time in each topic. <br /> *Don't know, but I appreciated this opportunity to listen and ask questions. <br /> *The Q&A session was handled very well.The police representatives were very candid and <br /> forthcoming. <br /> *Well done <br /> *More data. Include representative of officer of color---their experience. <br /> *Have the person answering the question repeat the question. <br /> *A part for interacting with other community members. <br /> *Good format. I think most people had their questions answered. <br /> *Really liked hearing the stories and examples. I myself might have liked hearing more stories, <br /> but I think a lot of really good info was presented. I think the audience appreciated all the info. <br /> *Thought it was very nice overall.Thankyou!! <br /> *Not much.The Facilitator was great. Good questions from participants. Very eye-opening <br /> about mental illness, ICE, and officer training. <br /> *Engage the community in more discussion and problem-solving(felt like more of a monologue, <br /> not a dialogue.) <br /> *Glad the Sheriff was here. Needed to be at the table because we are so closely linked to jail in <br /> the sheriff's hands. <br /> *Was great! <br /> * Get more info on data collection and how minorities are specifically affected by police <br /> practices in Roseville. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.