My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017_1115_HRIEC_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Human Rights, Inclusion and Engagement Commission
>
Packets
>
2017
>
2017_1115_HRIEC_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2018 9:20:42 AM
Creation date
5/10/2018 9:19:21 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, June 7, 2010 <br /> Page 2 <br /> Councilmember Roe opined that having a policy in place did not preclude anyone <br /> from the public or City Council bringing a request forward; but in fact provided <br /> bullet points for arguing for or against a specific request and allowing for City <br /> Council discussion. Councilmember Roe spoke in support of having a written <br /> policy in place, tied to the Imagine Roseville 2025 community visioning process. <br /> Mayor Klausing clarified that the intent of the policy is not to control what <br /> Councilmembers can bring forward, noting that as an elected official, they could <br /> bring forward any request; but the intent was to have a more formal policy in <br /> place, better articulating why a request is relevant for action by the City Council, <br /> and providing a framework for evaluation. <br /> Councilmember Ihlan opined that she was not opposed to having policy <br /> guidelines, but that it should be ultimately up to the City Council to make those <br /> decision; as long as such a policy was to frame discussions and not provide <br /> rationale for denying requests. <br /> Councilmember Pust advised that when she had brought a recent request forward, <br /> she was not aware that there was an unwritten policy; however, she expressed her <br /> appreciation of tonight's discussion; and clarified that it was not her intent <br /> through this discussion that any pending requests be restricted or put on hold; and <br /> expressed her anticipation that the pending request be brought forward at a future <br /> meeting. Councilmember Pust expressed her interest in going on record that she <br /> was not attempting to restrict anything. <br /> Councilmember Johnson opined that this policy would be a great step, and <br /> concurred with Councilmember Roe in the need to recognize that the health of the <br /> community was based on its volunteers, diversity and ethnic groups; and that the <br /> policy should provide an opportunity to recognize as many of those people as <br /> possible to make them feel comfortable as part of the Roseville community. <br /> City Manager Malinen offered that staff draft some policy guidelines for City <br /> Council consideration in the future; as well as having the pending proclamation <br /> request on the next meeting agenda. <br /> Klausing moved, Johnson seconded, that the City Council adopt the following <br /> policy concerning proclamations or resolution issued by the City Council: <br /> ■ Such proclamations or resolutions must relate specifically to an interest of the <br /> residents of the City of Roseville; <br /> ■ Such proclamations or resolutions must relate to a stated policy of the City of <br /> Roseville as established in documents such as Imagine Roseville 2025; <br /> ■ Such proclamations or resolution may be adopted to recognize the <br /> achievements of individuals or groups with a Roseville connection or to <br /> support the philanthropic works of such individuals or groups. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.