My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016_0111_CCPacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2016
>
2016_0111_CCPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2018 11:32:14 AM
Creation date
6/15/2018 11:31:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
1/11/2016
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
216
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
to residents. Mr. Culver noted this would require a cost for the city and impact utility rates <br />accordingly to offer such a cap. While it wouldn’t cover the total costs of such a program, <br />Mr. Culver suggested municipal revenue royalties from such an insurance program could <br />serve to offset those costs. <br />Chair Stenlund stated he was not prepared to talk about an inspection cap at the property <br />line any more at this time. <br />Member Cihacek stated that this remained his pet project and that he remained interested <br />in pursuing potential bid alternatives in neighborhoods under construction for those <br />residents desiring such an option, and for new construction moving forward but not old <br />residences. With this program, Member Cihacek stated he was less concerned, as clean- <br />up could be taken care of over time; but agreed to tabling further conversation on it until <br />February or March of 2016 to review this program first to determine how well it would <br />perform. However, Member Cihacek opined it provided a good solution for many of <br />Roseville’s residents and the aging infrastructure throughout the community. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.