2016_0111_CCPacket - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Paschke clarified that any revisions to those details would not change the location of the lots, only access points and/or amenities but not lot configurations. At the further request of Member Gitzen, Mr. Paschke advised that to his knowledge, Ramsey County was not requesting any right-of-way for Victoria Street beyond that already dedicated; and clarified that the City was not seeking any additional right-of- way for a right turn lane. Mr. Paschke further clarified for Member Gitzen that parking for the ball field would be addressed through a shared agreement for a certain guaranteed number of spaces, and become part of the site design and final documents rather than recorded against the plat. From a technical perspective, Chair Boguszewski suggested revised less-specific language under recommended Condition C to identify the “City’s authorized tree service” rather than its current consulting firm. Mr. Paschke concurred. The applicant’s representatives were present but had no additional comment beyond staff’s written report and verbal presentation. Public Comment Marianne Hedin, 2690 Oxford Street, Unit #210 Ms. Hedin stated all the neighbors remained up-in-arms about something they apparently couldn’t do anything about, and that being the proposed four-story building. Ms. Hedin stated she lived in a three-story condominium, and homes surrounding them were all one-story; and opined that this proposed building didn’t blend in with surrounding buildings. Ms. Hedin noted the previous buildings housing the school and Comcast were one story; and noted the ball fields were already the highest point of land in that area. Chair Boguszewski closed the public hearing at 7:35 p.m.; no one else spoke. MOTION Member Bull moved, seconded by Member Gitzen to recommend to the City Council approval of the proposed PRELIMINARY PLAT of Applewood Pointe of Roseville at Central Park, generally comprising the property at 934 Woodhill Drive and 2659 Victoria Street; as detailed and based on the information and analysis, and as conditioned and outlined in the project report dated December 2, 2015; amended as follows: Condition D revised to read: “\[S & S Tree Service\] \[The City’s authorized tree service\] shall approve the final tree preservation plan prior to the issuance of a building permit.” Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Abstentions: 2 (Boguszewski and Murphy) Motion carried.