My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2018_0604
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2018
>
CC_Minutes_2018_0604
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2018 4:13:02 PM
Creation date
6/21/2018 4:11:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/4/2018
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, June 4, 2018 <br /> Page 2 <br /> sion. The City has had community engagement around policing in the past, and she <br /> would like to bring the community together in the wake of a difficult event. <br /> 5. Recognitions, Donations, and Communications <br /> 6. Items Removed from Consent Agenda <br /> h. Snelling Ave Alternative Review Study Professional Services Contract <br /> At the request of Councilmember McGehee, City Manager Trudgeon briefly high- <br /> lighted this item as detailed in the Request for Council Action (RCA) and related <br /> attachments dated June 4, 2018. <br /> Councilmember McGehee commented she has talked to Public Works Director <br /> Culver about this several times already. She expressed concern because this is not <br /> part of a master plan. Residents would like to cross Snelling on foot safely, and <br /> this will not help that happen. This $19,000 is yet another expenditure not budg- <br /> eted for. This is a misuse of funds. There was no plan to put this forward. She <br /> realizes that Mr. Culver likes roads, but she is not on the side of more roads as <br /> there is already enough traffic. This $19,000 should be spent on a planning pro- <br /> cess for what the residents are actually asking for. She suggested delaying this. <br /> study since there is no plan. She does not know why this is happening right now. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte noted she wanted this item removed as well, because <br /> the Council discussed this originally in the context of the work being done on <br /> 35W. She also realizes the City does not want to be a through-fare to Rice Creek <br /> Commons when that is built. There is also an issue with County Road C in terms <br /> of traffic and safety. She would welcome a conversation about that particular area <br /> in general. <br /> Councilmember Etten asked Public Works Director Culver to address what this <br /> study is intended to look at. <br /> Public Works Director Culver stated part of this study is to address some of MN- <br /> DOT's concerns, and to also look at the larger picture. He considers this a mini- <br /> corridor study to ensure the right thing is being done. The City did apply for fed- <br /> eral funding. Staff still has not identified a private party development to help <br /> fund the cost participation of this. There is some time, given that this project is <br /> slated for 2021 to ensure the right thing is being done. This study will answer the <br /> questions of the Council and will help deliver the best project. <br /> Councilmember Etten concurred this study will help look at different instruments <br /> and what other parties need to be involved. <br /> Mayor Roe concurred part of the point of looking at the additional lane in the <br /> north bound was to address rush hour concerns, which affect the ability to get <br /> across Snelling. If alternatives are considered that are different or better at solv- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.