Laserfiche WebLink
Letter of Transmittal <br />August 24, 1981 <br />The Honorable Mayor and City Council, <br />Submitted herewith is the proposed 1981 annual budget. <br />Introduction <br />It is the intent of this letter to give a broad overview of the budget <br />noting sipnificant changes from the previous year. It is divided into <br />four major areas: Levy and Mill Rate, Assessed Valuation, Revenue and <br />Expenditures. <br />In general, the 19II2 budget reflects only the projected effects of <br />inflation while keeping in mind the new 8% levy limitation. This budget <br />offers an austere program of City services with no significant program <br />chanqes. Certain other changes specific to a department are mentioned <br />in the budget detail under Program PJotes. <br />Levy and P4i11 Rate <br />The 1982 proposed budaet will require a tax levy of $3,460,645 compared <br />to the current year levy of 53,095,843a This oroposed increase of <br />5364,II02 is 11.7II% over 19II1. Given the estimated assessed valuation <br />discussed belovr, it is estimated the 1982 mill rate will be 11.605 mills <br />compared to 11.431 mills in 19Q1. This is a 1.5% increase in mill rate. <br />Assessed Valuation <br />The 19II2 assessed valuation in Roseville as of July 23, 1981, is $29II,193,786. <br />This compares to a 1981 assessed valuation of �269,948,296 which is a <br />$28,245,490, or 10.46% increase. These valuations include adjustments for <br />fiscal disparities. <br />Primarily, the increase in assessed valuation is a result of the impact of <br />inflation on property values. According to figures provided by Ramsey <br />County, the average home in Roseville was valued at $69,339 in 1981 and <br />$76,216 for 1982. This is a 9.1% increase. With a projected mill rate of <br />11.605 this average home would receive a tax increase of 11.04% over 1981. <br />This, of course, is only the City's portion of the total levy. Estimates <br />of the County and School District levies were not available. <br />It should be noted that while the levy requirement has increased 71.78% <br />aqainst a levy limitation of II%, there are certain exclusions from this <br />limitation. blith these exclusions the levy increase subject to the limit- <br />ation is slightly under 8%. <br />