|
Revenue
<br />The revenues included in the 1983 budget are summarized beloiv.
<br />Property Tax
<br />Intergovernmental
<br />Licenses $ Permits
<br />Court Fines
<br />Charges for Services
<br />Special Assessments
<br />Transfers F, P9isc.
<br />Total
<br />Amount
<br />1982 1983 Increase
<br />Adopted Proposed (Decrease)
<br />$ 3,460,645
<br />1,393,075
<br />257,900
<br />40,000
<br />3,916,170
<br />547,595
<br />8Q3,63S
<br />$ 3,647,534 � 186,889
<br />1,241,525 (151,550)
<br />285,400 30,500
<br />55,000 15,000
<br />4,522,793 606,623
<br />546,855 (740)
<br />679,038 (204,600)
<br />Percent
<br />Increase
<br />(Decrease)
<br />5.40
<br />(10.88)
<br />11.83
<br />37.50
<br />15.49
<br />(.14)
<br />(23.15)
<br />$10,499,023 $10,981,145 $ 482,122 4.59
<br />The above chart contains several areas of interest:
<br />1) Intergovernmental revenues have decreased by �151,550 or 10.88%. Of
<br />this reduction, 596,230 is due to a change in tlle way revenues are
<br />categorized. The revenues represented by the �96,230 amount have been
<br />included in Charges for 5ervices in 1983, rather than in Intergovernmental
<br />revenues as they were in 1982. The remainder of the reduction is due
<br />to the elimination of State Dutch Elm aid and the reduction in federal
<br />revenue sharing from $185,000 to $147,000.
<br />2)
<br />3)
<br />Licenses and fees are up $30,OOO,reflecting the recent increase in fees
<br />for business licenses.
<br />The decrease in special assessments is simply due to a clecrease in special !
<br />assessments outstanding at this time.
<br />4) Charges for Services has increased by 15.490, reflecting the accounting
<br />change noted in itl above and the increase in Deputy Registrar fees from
<br />$2.50 to $3.25 per transaction effective 1/1/83.
<br />S) The decrease in Transfers is due to a reduction in the need to use fund
<br />reserves to finance budgeted expenditures.
<br />�xpenditures
<br />Total proposed expenditures for 1983 are $10,931,145. This is an increase of
<br />4.590, or �482,122 over 1982, A comparison of major categories of expenditure
<br />with those of 1982 is shown below.
<br />Personal Services
<br />Other Curreiit �,xpenses
<br />Capital tixpenses
<br />Debt Services
<br />i�sz
<br />Budget
<br />$ 3,369,336
<br />4,695,991
<br />517,427
<br />--1,91C,269
<br />l�ss
<br />Proposed
<br />$ 3,642,978
<br />5,068,550
<br />462,580
<br />_ 1,t307,037
<br />Total $10,�499,025 $10,981,145
<br />Amount
<br />Increase
<br />(Decrease)
<br />$ 273,642
<br />372,559
<br />(54,847)
<br />-- (109,�32)-
<br />�4b2,122
<br />Percent
<br />Increase
<br />(Decrease)
<br />8.120
<br />7.93
<br />(10.G0)
<br />(5.70)
<br />4.59
<br />
|