Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br />In reviewing Table "8" it is clear that almost every year there <br />was an anlysis of need, and the staffing level was adjusted <br />accordingly. It is also evident that the staffing complement has <br />not grown in real terms over the past ten years. The City has <br />added or subtracted as the need and policies dictated. <br />The recommendation to divest the City of municipal liquor opera- <br />tions was made on the basis its projected financial success was <br />extremely marginal. The purpose of the City being in the retail <br />liquor business was to provide revenue for City facilities and <br />services. It contributed in excess of a million dollars in <br />revenue, of which most was invested in the park system. <br />The Building Inspection Department is immediately sensitive to <br />swings in the building economy. In 1984, a position vacated by <br />retirement was not filled. In the 1987 Budget additional hours <br />were provided, and if building activities continue at the same <br />rate, additional staffing will be necessary. <br />In 1986, the Public Works and Park Maintenance Divisions were � <br />reorganized and positions added and deleted. ' <br />In 1987, the City decided to eliminate the Public Health Sani- <br />tarian, and transfer that responsibility to the County Health <br />Department. This would be effective January 1, 1988. <br />In Table "9", there is a comparison of Roseville's staffing with <br />other cities. Roseville compares very favorably in numbers of <br />employees per thousand population, and is the lowest in numbers <br />of employees per $10 million of assessed valuation. ' <br />Government, like any business, operates in an environment which <br />is changing at a rapid rate. Roseville has attempted to keep <br />pace with the changing technologies, citizen needs or wishes, and <br />the factors which allow Roseville to be a competitive place in <br />which to live, play, work, and learn. <br />