Laserfiche WebLink
G E O R G E M. H A N S E N C O M P A N Y, P. A. <br />.1 Vrn/essi ��ml Corparmlmi njCertilird P�<hlic Arnnuum;�� <br />1 i5 SOUTH PLAZA SW.�OiNG <br />Mt1VNcAPOLIS,MINNE�C]TA5541 � <br />ACCOUNTANTS' OPINION <br />The City Council oi <br />Roseville, Minnesota <br />'��, We have examined the combined financial statements of the City of Roseville, <br />� Minnesota, as of ar.d for the year ended December 31, 1980, as listed in Section <br />,. II-A of the table of contents. Our examination was made in accordance �.�ith <br />'��, generally accepted auditing standards and, accordingly, included such tests of <br />��� the accounting records and such other auditing procedures as we conside-.ed <br />necessary in the circumstances. <br />In our opinion, the combined financial statements referred to above present <br />fairly the financi�l. position of the City oT Roseville, Minnesota, at <br />December 31, 1980, and the results of its operations and the changes in <br />�iaun�iai pc�ition of its proprietarv iur.d tvpes �or the year then ended, in <br />coniormity with generally accepted accounting principles applied on a basis <br />consistent except for the change, with which we concur, in the method of <br />reporcing recenue �ia the State-eid Street Con�•tructi.on Fund as described in <br />Note 2 to the financial statzments. <br />Our examina�ion �.ras mace fcr t4e purpose of forming an opinion on the combined <br />`inancial statements taken as a whole. The combining, individual fund, and <br />account group financial statements listed in Section II-B of the table of contents <br />are presented for purposes of additi.onal analysis and are not a required part of <br />the combined financial statements of t,ie Ci�y of Rusevi�le, P;innesota. ihe <br />i��o_r.i�tion has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the <br />examination of the combined financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly <br />stated in all material respects in relation to the canbined financial statements <br />takea as a oahole. Our examination did not include the statistical information .__ <br />(Section III) listed in the table of contents. - <br />April 24, 1981 <br />' S�� � �� c��r>.�%��; � �l . <br />ll <br />