Laserfiche WebLink
FORM 04 <br />,,;a.e.ro. -r.�.c-Yr�:. r t. . �s.3a� � r,. �: v aq v a��... _. y.. �F »....!: a++'t� �)kw?2aia�..� . i..v:�.4i- 1 �+:. e :. ;o{._..:�.wsi£:: <br />��� :: Z. a �f ¢ .'1 ^ � '�k � <br />�'.� x � F ; t r +{` � * & i � � I i <br />� • <br />AUDI^tORS' COMPLIANCE REPORT BASED ON AN EXr�''�fINATION <br />OF TY,E GENERAL PURPOSE FINANCIAL STATE:IENTS PERFOR:✓�ED IN <br />ACCORDA;v'CE WITH THE STA�v'DARDS FOR AUDIT ISSUED BY TF-?E GAO <br />City Council <br />City of Roseville, Minnesota <br />i9e have examined the general purpose financial statements of the <br />City of Roseville, Minnesota, for the year ended December 31, <br />1988, and have issued our report thereon dated i�iarch 30, 1989. <br />Our examination was made in accordance with generally accepted <br />auditing standards; the standards for financial and compliance <br />audits contained in the Standards £or Audit of Governmental <br />Organizations, Pro rams, Activities, and Functions, issued by tne <br />U.S. General Accounting Ofiice, and the provisions of the Leqal <br />Comoliance Audit Guide'oromulgated by the Legal Compliance Task <br />Force pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sec. 6.65. Accordingly, tne <br />examinaticn included such tests of the accounting recor3s and <br />such other auditing procedures as we considered necessary in the <br />circumstances. <br />The managemeat of the City of Roseville, Minnesota, is respons- <br />ible for the City's compliance with laws and regulations. In <br />connection with our examination r=_ferred to above, we selected <br />and tested transactions and records to determine the City's com- <br />pliance witn laws and regulations �oncompliance with which could <br />have a material effect on the general purpose financial state- <br />ments of the City. <br />The results of our tests indicate that for the items tested, the <br />City of Roseville, Minnesota, complied with those provisions of <br />laws and regulations noncompliance with which could have a <br />material effect on the general purpose financial statements. <br />Nothing came to our attention tnat caused us to believe that for <br />the items not tested the City of Roseville, Minnesota was not in <br />comoliance with laws or regulatior.s noncompliance with which <br />could have a material effect on the City's general purpose finan- <br />cial statements. <br />The Leqal ( <br />compliance <br />investments <br />claims and <br />categories. <br />'omoliance Audit Guide covers five main cat�gories of <br />to be *_ested: concracting and bidding, deposits and <br />conflicts of interest, public indebtedness, and <br />dis'nursements. Our study included a11 of the listed <br />88 <br />