My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Annual_Report_1988_001
Roseville
>
Budget
>
Annual_Report_1988_001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/22/2018 12:32:53 PM
Creation date
6/22/2018 12:32:19 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
General Fixed Asset Account Group <br />General Fixed Assets are those fixed assets used in the <br />performance of general governmental functions and exclude fixed <br />assets of the enterprise funds. The City has chosen to report <br />all public domain fixed assets, such as streets, traffic control, <br />and similar assets that are immovable and of value only to the <br />City. The City has started a program of reviewing the machinery <br />and equipment inventory. Adjustments have been made to the <br />inventory records, and are reflected in the addition and <br />deduction columns of the General Fixed Assets records. <br />General Lona-Term Debt Account Group <br />General long-term debt is used to account for general obligation <br />bonds, general obligation tax increment bonds, general obligation <br />State aid highway bonds, accrued vacation pay and compensatory <br />time off for governmental fund types, and other forms of long- <br />term debt supported by general revenues which are obligations of <br />the City as a whole and not its individual funds. <br />Revenue Limitations <br />Fiscal Disparities <br />The State Legislature enacted a Fiscal Disparity Law in 1971, <br />which was not implemented until taxes payable in 1975, due to <br />constitutional challenge. The law provides for the pooling of <br />forty percent of all new commercial and industrial property <br />valuations in the seven county metropolitan area. In turn, <br />valuations from this pool are to be redistributed to taxing <br />jurisdictions according to specific criteria. Although it is <br />difficult to determine the future impact of the Fiscal Disparity <br />Law on the City, the law had the effect of reducing taxable <br />valuation as follows: <br />Assessed Value <br />Real Estate <br />Personal Property <br />Area Wide Pool <br />Contributed to pool <br />Distributed from pool <br />Net (loss) <br />Net assessed value <br />•:: <br />$364,022,149 <br />6,253,834 <br />S370,275,983 <br />$(49,927,271) <br />22,975,300 <br />�(26,951,971) <br />5343,324,012 <br />1987 <br />$354,265,348 <br />6,010,884 <br />S360.276.232 <br />$(41,253,858) <br />19,284,144 <br />S(21,969,714) <br />S338,306,518 <br />Roseville's 1988 mill rate would have been 8.1� less without <br />fiscal disparities. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.