Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, MINNESOTA <br />NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (CONTINUED) <br />DECEM9ER 31,1988 <br />Note 12 - Defined 9enefit Pension PLans - Statewide (Continued) <br />hutions required of all participating entities. ior the PEPFF, con[ributions for the year ended June 30, <br />�988, represented 0.83 percent of totat contributions required of aLL participating entities. <br />C. Funding Status and Progress <br />1. Pension Benefit Obtigation <br />The 'pension henefit o6tigation' is a standardized discLosure measure of the present value ot pension bene- <br />fits, adjusted for the effects of projected salary increases and step-rate 6enefits, estimated to 6e payabte <br />in the future as a result of empLoyee service to date. The measure, uhich is the actuariat present vatue of <br />credited projected 6enefits, is intended to help users assess the PERA's funding status on a going-concern <br />basis, assess progress made in accumulating sufficient assets to pay henefits when due, and make comparisons <br />among PuhLic EmpLoyees Retirement Systems and empLoyers. PERA does not make separate measurements of assets <br />and pension henefit obtigation for individuaL employers. <br />The pension benefit obligations of PERA as of June 30, 1988, were as foLLows: <br />Totat pension henefit <br />obLigations <br />Net assets availabLe <br />for benefits, at <br />market <br />Unfunded pension benefit <br />obLigation (assets in <br />ex<ess of obligations) <br />PERF <br />4 3,334,423,000 <br />S 2,749,289 000 <br />S( 585 134,000) <br />PEPFF <br />S 512,921,000 <br />S 584,871,000 <br />S 71.950 000 <br />The measurement of the pension 6enefit obLigation is hased on an actuarial vatuation as of June 3�, 1988. <br />Net assets avaiLabte to pay pension benefits were valued as of June 30, 1988. <br />2. Change in ActuariaL Methods <br />Prior to fiscaL year 1988, the mortatity ta6te used was the UP-1984 Unisex set forWard one year tor males <br />and sei back four years for femates. For fiscat year 1988, the PERA 9oard of 7rustees approved the use of <br />the 1971 Group Annuity MortaLity TabLe projected to 1984 for maLes and femates. The change was made in <br />order to reduce, if not eLiminate, the series of targe, annually recurring mortality losses that have 6een <br />reatized in the tast four years. With the adoption of the new mortaLity tahLe, the projected benefit obti- <br />gation intreased 5179,670,000 in the Pubtic Employees Retirement Fund and 518,805,000 in the PubLic Employ- <br />ees Police and Fire Fund. <br />43 <br />