Laserfiche WebLink
Operating revenuea <br />User Charges <br />Total Operating Revenues <br />Operating expenses <br />Personnel <br />Depreciation <br />Other <br />Total Operating Expenses <br />Operating income <br />Nonoperating revenues <br />Transfers in (out) <br />Net Income <br />Debt ,�+*�+Stratio� <br />Summarv of Outstandina Debt <br />1993 <br />$ 494,639 <br />S 494,839 <br />$ 90,953 <br />144,135 <br />189,651 <br />S 424,739 <br />$ 70,100 <br />68,697 <br />(20,000) <br />S 118,797 <br />1992 <br />$ 520,375 <br />S 520,375 <br />$ 84,642 <br />155,282 <br />191,132 <br />S 431,056 <br />$ 89,319 <br />118,586 <br />S 207,905 <br />Net bonded debt per capita, and the percentage of net debt to <br />assessed value and to market value are useful indicators of the <br />City's debt position. Debt atatistics for the City as of Decem- <br />ber 31, 1993, as shown in Table 9, are as follows: <br />Net Direct <br />Debt <br />Net Over- <br />Lapping <br />Debt <br />Total 1993 <br />Total 1992 <br />Percent of <br />Amount Tax Capacitv <br />$32,358,724 <br />522,907,794 <br />555,266,518 <br />84.18� <br />59.59� <br />143.77� <br />Percent of Debt Per <br />Market Value Cavita <br />1.95� <br />1.38� <br />3.34$ <br />547,676,493 115.51� 2.86$ <br />$ 965.30 <br />S 683.37 <br />51,648.66 <br />$1,423.48 <br />Net direct debt is based on Roseville's outstanding indebtedness, <br />less cash and investmenta on hand. Net overlapping debt ia <br />Roseville's pro-rata ahare of bonded indebtednesa for the county, <br />school districts, and other governmental agencies that levy taxes <br />within the City. <br />Under state law, the City's 1993 debt limit ia $33,031,742 of <br />which the City has 99� available margin. Much of the debt the <br />City has isaued is outside of the computation and does not apply <br />to the limitation. <br />16 <br />