My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Annual_Report_1994_001
Roseville
>
Budget
>
Annual_Report_1994_001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/22/2018 12:38:55 PM
Creation date
6/22/2018 12:38:12 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FORM PS <br />Eide Helmeke PLLP <br />Certified Public Accountants & Consultants <br />INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT ON COMPLIANCE WTTfi SPECIFIC REOUII2EMENTS <br />APPLICABLE TO NONMAJOR FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM TRANSACTIONS <br />The Honorable Mayor and <br />Members of the Ciry Council <br />Ciry of Roseviile <br />Rosevitle, Minnesota <br />We have audited the general purpose financial statements of the City of Rosevilte, Minnesota, as of and for the yeaz <br />ended December 31, 1994, and have issued our report thereon dated April l3, 1995. <br />In connection with our audit of the genera( purpose financial statemenu of the City of Roseville, Minnesota, as of and <br />for the yeaz ended December 31, 1994, and with our study and evaluation of the Ciry's intemal controi systems used <br />to administer federal financial assistance programs, u required by Office of Management and Budget Circulaz A-128, <br />"Audiss of State and Locai Governments", we selected cenain uansacrions appiicable to certain nonmajor fedemt <br />financial assistance program for the yeaz ended December3l, 1994. As required by CirculazA-128, we have performed <br />auditing procedures to test compiiance with the requiremenu goveming types of services aliowed or unallowed, <br />repomng and special requirements that are applicabie to those transactions. Our procedures were substantially less in <br />scope than an audit the objecrive of which is the expression of an opinion on the City's compliance with these <br />requirements. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. <br />With respect to the items tested, ihe results of those procedures disclosed no instances of noncomptiance with the <br />requirements listed in the preceding paragraph. With respect to items not tested, nothing came to our attenrion that <br />caused us to believe that the City of Roseville, Minnesota, had not complied, in all material respecu, with those <br />requiremenu. <br />T'his repoa is intended for the information of Management, the Ciry Council, state agencies, the Federal Cognizant <br />Audit Agency and other federal agencies. However, this report is a matter of public record and its dimibution is not <br />limited. <br />�'� ���,r�rL� /'�L P <br />April 13, 1995 <br />Minneapolis, Minnesota <br />111 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.