My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2018-06-26_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2018
>
2018-06-26_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2018 8:12:50 AM
Creation date
7/25/2018 10:40:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
6/26/2018
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Member Misra asked about the spikes on the flow graph. Mr. Sandstrom stated <br />that was correlated with the heavy rains the last few years. <br />Chair Cihacek stated that the commission has monitored this very closely over the <br />past few years and discussed the topic extensively. He thanked the staff for their <br />presentations and suggested that commissioners look at past meetings if they <br />wanted to learn more as well. <br />6. Pathway Master Plan Update <br />Mr. Freihammer explained that there have been a few updates since they last <br />discussed the plan and stated that in that time there was a meeting with the parks <br />department. He stated that the plan would be included as an appendix in the City's <br />2040 Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Freihammer stated that along with three <br />commission meetings to discuss the plan was also a focus group/open house that <br />was held. He said they are hoping to bring the plan forward to the Council at the <br />joint meeting on July 9, 2018. <br />Mr. Freihammer stated that over 15 miles of pathways have been installed over the <br />past 10 years. He stated that a variety of funding methods have been used to install <br />both on -road and off-road pathways and commented that there is no one designated <br />funding source for this project. He stated that the pathways built in the last 10 years <br />have been throughout various areas of the city. He explained that the scoring criteria <br />for the pathways has been updated to a more fact based, less subjective system. He <br />further explained how a few changes happened to the scores as a result of the new <br />scoring system. <br />Chair Cihacek asked if the park and rides were included or if only the transit center <br />was included. Mr. Freihammer replied that both were included. <br />Vice Chair Wozniak stated that he had few corrections and comments and stated <br />that he did not need to go through them all but could email them to staff. He pointed <br />out specifically a path on page 13. Mr. Freihammer replied that there is a full <br />pathway where he was referring to. He stated that County Road C was planned for <br />reconstruction and a connection would occur at that time. <br />Chair Cihacek stated that there was a lot of effort put into the plan and that they <br />feel is it a detailed plan. <br />Member Kruse inquired if applying for funds from the Metropolitan Council was <br />ever considered. Mr. Culver stated that there are some projects that have used <br />federal funds. He stated that they would need county support to apply for such <br />funds. Mr. Culver stated that often times it costs money and time in order to develop <br />preliminary layouts and cost estimates in order to apply for those funds. The City <br />does not necessarily have readily available funds to prepare those layouts and <br />estimates. <br />Page 5 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.