My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2018_0716
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2018
>
CC_Minutes_2018_0716
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2018 9:51:21 AM
Creation date
8/16/2018 9:51:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/16/2018
Meeting Type
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,July 16, 2018 <br /> Page 2 <br /> play in some form including the increase in the competitive bidding process <br /> threshold from $100,000 to $175,000. However, this will not necessarily have an <br /> immediate or direct budgetary impact in 2019. There were also a number of in- <br /> creases for various infrastructure and economic development funding that the City <br /> will potentially have access to. <br /> City Manager Trudgeon noted that the Council had previously decided to send out <br /> the budget response cards, so that the public would have the opportunity to com- <br /> ment on the City Manager's proposed budget. He asked for Council feedback on <br /> the potential wording of the response cards. <br /> Councilmember McGehee noted that the commercial/industrial and apartment <br /> units had different tax valuations as compared to the single-family homes. She al- <br /> so noticed that a lot of money was passed for parks and recreation in the 2018 <br /> State bonding bill. She wondered how the City could get on the list of things that <br /> were itemized for funding. <br /> Mayor Roe clarified that the Assessor's report lists the median value, which can <br /> be challenging to track with commercial/industrial, since property values range <br /> so widely in that category. He noted that the aggregate figure is perhaps more <br /> meaningful, as it increased 3.8%. <br /> Councilmember Willmus commented on the median value of residential, noting <br /> that the numbers on page 1 of the RCA were taken from the County, which takes <br /> its information from the Northstar/MLS. Current data may show that these num- <br /> bers are about 10% low. Looking at the transition from commercial properties to <br /> residential properties, it will be magnified even more going forward, as those <br /> numbers start to hit the books at the County. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte noted that the City will have to be talking to the legisla- <br /> tors about the City's bonding request during the entire 2019 session, because there <br /> will be a lot of education involved. It looks like there will be a lot of changes in <br /> the legislature, so many members will not know about regional assets. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that what is approved in the bonding bill is not always what <br /> everyone wants at the local level. Ultimately it comes down to the choice of the <br /> legislature. <br /> Mayor Roe moved the discussion to the draft budget response card. <br /> Councilmember McGehee noted it would be nice to include space for any addi- <br /> tional comments that did not fit into the printed questions. She also asked for a <br /> hard copy of the Power Point presentation from this agenda item at City Hall, <br /> should residents want to come in and look at it. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.