My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2018_0716
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2018
>
CC_Minutes_2018_0716
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2018 9:51:21 AM
Creation date
8/16/2018 9:51:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/16/2018
Meeting Type
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,July 16, 2018 <br /> Page 6 <br /> Councilmember Willmus asked about the Finance Commission's view of the var- <br /> ious staff recommendations. <br /> Finance Director Miller responded that the Finance Commission is still exploring <br /> the options. During the Finance Commission-City Council joint meeting in Sep- <br /> tember, the Finance Commission will have a number of recommendations. This <br /> area will be one of them. In the General Facilities Fund, there is agreement. The <br /> Finance Commission does have concerns about the Pavement Management Pro- <br /> gram, allowing the reserve level to draw down too far. They would prefer to keep <br /> it as an endowment fund and live off the interest earnings. <br /> Councilmember Willmus asked about page 3 on the RCA, specifically the para- <br /> graph about the projected deficit and measures that have been taken. <br /> Finance Director Miller read aloud the following paragraph from page 3 of the <br /> RCA: <br /> In contrast to the projected CIP spending of$186.7 million, the City ex- <br /> pects to have only $178.6 million available over that same time period <br /> based on current funding and cash reserve levels; leaving a funding deficit <br /> of$8.1 million. In comparison, the funding deficit five years ago was ap- <br /> proximately $70 million. <br /> Finance Director Miller noted that about $60 million in deficit has been taken off <br /> the books due to the actions of this Council and previous Councils. These were <br /> difficult decisions, but the outcome is that this is getting very close to sustainabil- <br /> ity. <br /> Councilmember McGehee stated this has been a collaborative effort between the <br /> Council and the City staff. <br /> Councilmember Willmus added that this also speaks to the fluidity of the docu- <br /> ment itself. The constant updating and adjusting of this is a big part of it. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that the vision in 2011/2012 was to make sure every year as a <br /> City, the Council look at all projected costs and funding and always doing the <br /> necessary analyses to get to the sustainability the City is looking for. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte agreed with the comments of her colleagues. Addition- <br /> ally, any discussion of repurposing a debt levy for another reason requires a con- <br /> versation with the community. <br /> Councilmember Etten noted most Cities are not addressing the water needs and <br /> capital needs across the country, according to an NPR story he recently heard, so <br /> Roseville is way ahead of the curve in that area. In regards to the shifting and <br /> making changes as needed, the Attachment D shows what the plan was last year, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.