My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2018_0813
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2018
>
CC_Minutes_2018_0813
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2018 4:15:51 PM
Creation date
8/29/2018 4:15:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
8/13/2018
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, August 13, 2018 <br /> Page 11 <br /> Mayor Roe agreed and thought if the area was smaller, then the Department could <br /> designate a point of contact in the neighborhood who could get the word out to <br /> others. <br /> b. Request by Vanbarton Group and Chick-fil-A to consider a condition modi- <br /> fication to Resolution #11511 (PF18-003) <br /> City Planner Paschke briefly highlighted this item as detailed in the RCA and re- <br /> lated attachments dated August 13, 2018. <br /> Ms. Roselyn Morrison, Asset Manager with the Vanbarton Group, stated they <br /> have not been able to execute an agreement because they have leases that explicit- <br /> ly prohibit material, permanent, and negative alterations to the common area. She <br /> has gone over all the major leases with their attorney and tried to find a way <br /> around it but unfortunately, they believe there isn't one. Ms. Morrison stated they <br /> did not believe this is necessary and from what she understands, is contrary to <br /> zoning. Further, Chick-fil-A has stated they do not need or want allocated or ex- <br /> clusive parking. She stated Mr. Jeff Agnes, AR Architects, has gone over this as <br /> well and does not feel there is a necessity for it. She wondered if there was any <br /> specific need looked at for this requirement that they could wrest in another way. <br /> Councilmember Willmus asked whether the concern on the part of the existing <br /> tenants is that their clientele might not have a place to park if there are designated <br /> spots for Chick-fil-A. <br /> Ms. Morrison stated it is not a concern but what is in the lease currently. They <br /> had to go to 8 or 9 of the major tenants to request waivers to build an outlot there. <br /> When they negotiated those waivers, which took almost four years, they believed <br /> what they had put in front of the tenants on the allocation of this specific area for <br /> Chick-fil-A, would be adequate. Neither Chick-fil-A nor the tenants have wanted <br /> exclusive parking. <br /> Councilmember Willmus stated from his perspective, the concern comes with be- <br /> ing familiar with the mall, traffic patterns, use patterns, along with busy and non- <br /> busy times of the year. Typically, if they have a stand-alone restaurant, they <br /> would have a ratio of so many parking stalls per number of seats. Those are all <br /> factors that enter into this for him. He stated this is a concern he has. <br /> Ms. Morrison believed there was adequate parking, not only in the front lot but in <br /> the entire center. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte stated one of the actions recommended is item B, which <br /> would be to remove the "exclusive use" language. She asked whether that mate- <br /> rially changed anything. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.