My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2018_0813
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2018
>
CC_Minutes_2018_0813
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2018 4:15:51 PM
Creation date
8/29/2018 4:15:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
8/13/2018
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, August 13, 2018 <br /> Page 13 <br /> they have with existing tenants or change the payments for maintaining common <br /> areas. <br /> Councilmember McGehee asked of the two items A and B, which one most close- <br /> ly models the existing tenant agreement that had been referred to earlier. <br /> Ms. Morrison indicated item A did. <br /> Councilmember McGehee stated if the Council wanted Chick-fil-A to be on a <br /> level playing field with the other major tenants, they would approve item A. <br /> Ms. Morrison stated she would request that. <br /> Mayor Roe asked if there was any public comment for this item. <br /> No one appeared to comment on this item. <br /> Laliberte moved approval of modifying Resolution No. 11511 by amending the <br /> language in Condition #2 by removing "the exclusive use of the" from the condi- <br /> tion. <br /> Mayor Roe declared the motion failed for lack of a second. <br /> McGehee moved, Etten seconded, approval of modifying Resolution No. 11511 <br /> by striking Condition #2 requiring designated parking stalls for exclusive use by <br /> the applicant's customers. <br /> Council Discussion <br /> Councilmember McGehee indicated she made the motion because she was satis- <br /> fied with the packet information and response of the representative. <br /> Councilmember Etten agreed and stated if the other major tenants were all right <br /> with this, then he was all right with it. However, he still had concerns with the to- <br /> tal capacity of the parking lot. <br /> Councilmember Willmus stated he initially voted against approval of the Condi- <br /> tional Use Permit for this site, has not changed his line of thought, and still has <br /> concerns regarding the flow of traffic through that portion of the center. He <br /> thought there would be issues throughout varying times of the year that could be <br /> significant but this was a significant improvement geographically within that <br /> parking area. Councilmember Willmus thought a condition made sense to have <br /> some exclusivity so they have some idea of where patrons would park. He stated <br /> he was going to stick to his original concerns. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.